Patient perspectives of prosthetic heart valve choice and anticoagulation in patients with rheumatic heart disease: a semi-quantitative study - Report - MDSpire

Patient perspectives of prosthetic heart valve choice and anticoagulation in patients with rheumatic heart disease: a semi-quantitative study

  • By

  • Shownok Saha

  • Danielle Gelbart

  • Francesco Pirone

  • David J. McCormack

  • Nishith N. Patel

  • June 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Patient Insights on Prosthetic Heart Valve Selection in RHD

Overview

This study explores the factors influencing prosthetic heart valve selection among patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) and their knowledge of anticoagulation management. Key findings indicate a preference for bioprosthetic valves among younger patients and highlight gaps in post-operative follow-up care.

Background

Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) significantly impacts cardiovascular health, particularly in lower socioeconomic populations. Surgical intervention, primarily valve replacement, is crucial for managing RHD, yet patient outcomes can be suboptimal due to challenges in anticoagulation management. Understanding patient preferences and experiences is essential for improving decision-making and care pathways.

Data Highlights

{'bioprosthetic_valves_implanted': '133 (61%) of 218 patients'}

Key Findings

  • Majority of patients (61%) received bioprosthetic valves.
  • Younger and older patients preferred bioprosthetic valves, while middle-aged patients favored mechanical valves.
  • Surgeons and cardiologists were the primary sources of information influencing valve choice.
  • Significant gaps in follow-up care were noted, with 34% not seeing a cardiologist post-operatively.
  • Patient education on valve durability and anticoagulation management is lacking.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare professionals should prioritize patient education regarding valve options and anticoagulation management to enhance decision-making. Establishing robust follow-up pathways is critical to ensure patients receive necessary post-operative care.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the need for improved educational resources and follow-up strategies to support RHD patients in their valve selection and anticoagulation management.

Related Resources & Content

  1. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2026 -- Transient numerical simulation of hemodynamics in bioprosthetic heart valves: insights into valve sizing and thrombosis risk
  2. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2024 -- Coupling of Right Ventricular Function to Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Aortic Stenosis Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
  3. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2026 -- Partner valves: role of a prospective device selection strategy using ACURATE and SAPIEN 3 as complementary devices in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  4. Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2025 -- Antithrombotic Approaches After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An Analysis of German Statutory Health Claims Data
  5. 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines -- Essential Messages on Valvular Heart Disease
  6. Anticoagulation in patients with rheumatic heart disease and atrial fibrillation: implications for low-resource regions
  7. https://www.escardio.org/static-file/Escardio/Guidelines/Products/Essential%20Messages/2025%20Gls/2025%20Essential%20Messages_VHD.pdf
  8. Apixaban or Warfarin in Patients With On-X Mechanical Aortic Valve - American College of Cardiology

Original Source(s)

Related Content