Proteomic Approaches for Heart Failure Prediction in Dysglycaemic Patients
Overview
High-throughput plasma proteomics identified four proteins associated with heart failure (HF) risk in individuals across glucose metabolism profiles, improving risk prediction beyond clinical factors. However, limitations in population diversity, outcome specificity, and predictive value temper immediate clinical application.
Background
Heart failure remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality among patients with abnormal glucose metabolism, yet current risk prediction models offer limited early identification. Traditional models rely on clinical factors and a few biomarkers but lack comprehensive systems-level insight. Proteomics offers potential to enhance risk stratification by capturing complex molecular alterations linked to HF development in dysglycaemia.
Data Highlights
Model
AUC
Population
Protein panel–clinical factors (PPCF)
0.823
UK Biobank discovery and validation cohorts (n=6517 and n=2783)
Clinical risk factor-only model
0.773
Same cohorts
Four-protein panel alone
0.801
Same cohorts
Positive predictive value (PPV) of PPCF model: 16.8%
Key Findings
Four proteins—NT-proBNP, LTBP2, REN, and GDF-15—were independently associated with incident heart failure.
The PPCF model combining these proteins with clinical variables improved discrimination (AUC 0.823) over clinical factors alone (AUC 0.773).
Model performance was consistent across glucose metabolism states, with better results in overt diabetes.
Study cohorts were predominantly White UK Biobank participants, limiting generalizability.
Outcome definition did not differentiate HFpEF from HFrEF, which have distinct pathophysiologies and proteomic profiles.
Single baseline protein measurements with long follow-up raise questions about capturing short-term versus long-term risk.
Clinical Implications
While proteomic risk models show promise in enhancing HF prediction in dysglycaemic patients, their modest incremental benefit over simpler models and low positive predictive value limit immediate clinical utility. Further validation in diverse populations and differentiation of HF subtypes are needed before routine implementation. Proteomic profiling may ultimately aid early intervention strategies if integrated with mechanistic insights.
Conclusion
Proteomic approaches represent an important advance in heart failure risk stratification among patients with abnormal glucose metabolism, but current evidence highlights challenges in clinical translation. Future research should focus on validation, mechanistic understanding, and refinement of predictive models to realize their full potential.
A prespecified exploratory analysis of the FIND-CKD clinical trial examined kidney function, albuminuria, and kidney failure outcomes in 903 patients with glomerular diseases.