Epidemiology and Outcomes of Bloodstream Infections in Patients in a Burns Intensive Care Unit: An 8-Year Retrospective Study - Report - MDSpire

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Bloodstream Infections in Patients in a Burns Intensive Care Unit: An 8-Year Retrospective Study

  • By

  • Héloïse Petit

  • Christian de Tymowski

  • Emmanuel Dudoignon

  • Mathilde Liberge

  • Jean-Luc Donay

  • Maite Chaussard

  • Maxime Coutrot

  • Alexandru Cupaciu

  • Lucie Guillemet

  • Benjamin Deniau

  • Alexandre Pharaboz

  • Mourad Benyamina

  • Blandine Denis

  • Guillaume Mellon

  • Matthieu Lafaurie

  • Alexandre Alanio

  • François Dépret

  • Béatrice Berçot

  • François Caméléna

  • March 12, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Epidemiology and Outcomes of Bloodstream Infections in Burns ICU: 8-Year Study

Overview

This retrospective study of 1402 burn patients admitted to a French burns ICU over eight years found bloodstream infections (BSIs) occurred in 21% of patients and were associated with older age, higher burn severity, and increased complications. Gram-positive bacteria predominated early, while multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa became more common after two weeks, highlighting evolving pathogen profiles.

Background

Burns intensive care units (BICUs) have improved survival in burn patients, but infections and sepsis remain leading causes of mortality, accounting for approximately 65% of deaths. Bloodstream infections significantly increase mortality risk, especially when caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Burn patients are at high risk for MDR infections due to prolonged hospitalization, invasive devices, and prior antibiotic exposure. Understanding local epidemiology is critical for guiding empirical antimicrobial therapy and infection control.

Data Highlights

ParameterValue
Total patients admitted1402
Patients with BSI303 (21%)
Median total body surface area burned10%
Common comorbiditiesSmoking, hypertension
Early BSI predominant pathogens (first week)Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus)
Late BSI predominant pathogens (>15 days)Gram-negative bacteria, especially MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Trends over study periodDecrease in Acinetobacter baumannii; increase in MDR P. aeruginosa after 2015

Key Findings

  • BSI occurred in 21% of burn patients admitted to the BICU.
  • Patients with BSI were older, had higher severity scores, larger burn areas, and more complications than those without BSI.
  • Gram-positive bacteria, mainly Staphylococcus aureus, dominated early bloodstream infections within the first week.
  • Gram-negative pathogens, particularly multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, became more prevalent after 15 days of hospitalization.
  • Over the 8-year period, Acinetobacter baumannii infections decreased significantly, while MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections increased after 2015.
  • Surveillance cultures and multidisciplinary antibiotic stewardship were integral to managing infections and guiding therapy.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should be aware of the temporal shift in causative pathogens of bloodstream infections in burn patients, with early infections typically caused by gram-positive bacteria and later infections by MDR gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Empirical antimicrobial therapy should be guided by local epidemiology and adjusted based on surveillance cultures and susceptibility data. Infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship programs are essential to reduce MDR pathogen emergence and improve patient outcomes.

Conclusion

Bloodstream infections remain a significant complication in burn patients, with evolving pathogen profiles over time that impact management strategies. Continuous surveillance and tailored antimicrobial approaches are crucial to optimize outcomes in this vulnerable population.

References

  1. Saint-Louis University Hospital BICU Study 2012-2020 -- Analysis of Bloodstream Infection Epidemiology and Patient Outcomes in a Burns Intensive Care Unit

Original Source(s)

Related Content