Therapeutic scarification, shadow pain, and integrative geriatric rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older adults in Cameroon: a prospective mixed-methods observational study - Summary - MDSpire

Therapeutic scarification, shadow pain, and integrative geriatric rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older adults in Cameroon: a prospective mixed-methods observational study

  • By

  • Ibrahim Npochinto Moumeni

  • Abdel-Nasser Njikam Moumeni

  • Jean-Marie Alima

  • France Mourey

  • Faustin Atemkeng Tsatedem

  • June 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To analyze the prevalence, typology, and geriatric-specific complications of therapeutic scarification among older adults with chronic musculoskeletal pain in Cameroon, and to evaluate the preliminary effectiveness of a culturally integrative physiotherapy approach bridging traditional and conventional medicine, highlighting its public health significance.

Key Findings:
  • Ninety-two patients enrolled with a mean age of 73.1 years; 60% were women.
  • Four scarification modalities identified: parallel linear (63.0%), punctiform (20.7%), deep cruciform (12.0%), micro-scarification with cupping (4.3%).
  • Knee osteoarthritis was the most common condition (44.6%).
  • Complications included infections (15.2%), keloids (34.8%), and proprioceptive impairment (35.9%), with a 29% increase in relative fall risk (p < 0.01).
  • A significant age-complication gradient was observed (OR = 4.9 for >75 vs. 65–70 years; p = 0.032).
  • Education level inversely correlated with scarification frequency (r = −0.67; p < 0.001).
  • Among 68 patients receiving the integrative approach, 73.5% reduced scarification use (p < 0.001) with significant functional improvements and 89.7% patient satisfaction.
Interpretation:

Therapeutic scarification exposes older adults to preventable geriatric complications, including a previously unrecognized fall risk from proprioceptive disruption. The 'shadow pain' mechanism offers a novel neurophysiological explanation for treatment adherence, emphasizing the need for awareness in geriatric care.

Limitations:
  • The study is observational and lacks a control group.
  • Findings are based on a single-center experience, limiting generalizability.
  • Potential biases in qualitative data collection should be considered.
Conclusion:

The culturally integrative rehabilitation model achieved preliminary effectiveness supporting the development of context-sensitive geriatric care strategies in low-resource settings. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and further explore the implications for geriatric care.

Original Source(s)

Related Content