Clinical efficacy analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis - Quiz - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparative Study of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery (CLS) for Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center

  • By

  • Kai Deng

  • Yi-ran Li

  • Teng-long Guo

  • Jun-zhe Dou

  • Yu-liang Cui

  • Ying-feng Su

  • July 13, 2025

Share

Original Source(s)

Clinical efficacy analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis

  • by Kai Deng, Yi-ran Li, Teng-long Guo, Jun-zhe Dou, Yu-liang Cui, Ying-feng Su

  • July 13, 2025

Related Content

Long-term objective hiatal hernia recurrence after magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic fundoplication: a multicenter cohort study of moderate and large hiatal hernias

Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Tests—From Efficacy to Implementation

FOLFOX-Induced Small-Bowel Pneumatosis in a Patient With Duodenal Adenocarcinoma: A Rare Case Report

  • October 20, 2026