Systematic Review and Expert Consensus on the Use of Long-acting Monoclonal Antibodies for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease: ARMADA (Advancing RSV Management And Disease Awareness) Taskforce - Quiz - MDSpire

Systematic Review and Expert Consensus on the Use of Long-acting Monoclonal Antibodies for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease: ARMADA (Advancing RSV Management And Disease Awareness) Taskforce

  • By

  • Paolo Manzoni

  • Eugenio Baraldi

  • Fabio Midulla

  • Olivier Claris

  • Sandro Dessardo

  • Terho Heikkinen

  • Richard Thwaites

  • Bosco Paes

  • Xavier Carbonell-Estrany

  • Dmytro Dobryanskyy

  • Merih Cetinkaya

  • Adel S Al Harbi

  • Ji-Man Kang

  • Anne Goh Eng Neo

  • Hsin Chi

  • Guilherme Sant’Anna

  • Mónica Villa Guillén

  • Gonzalo Luis Mariani

  • Marco Aurelio Palazzi Safadi

  • Soledad Urzua

  • Heather J Zar

  • Pierre Goussard

  • Barry Rodgers-Gray

  • Nicola Waghorne

  • Manuel Sanchez Luna

  • July 2, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Original Source(s)

Systematic Review and Expert Consensus on the Use of Long-acting Monoclonal Antibodies for Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease: ARMADA (Advancing RSV Management And Disease Awareness) Taskforce

  • by Paolo Manzoni, Eugenio Baraldi, Fabio Midulla, Olivier Claris, Sandro Dessardo, Terho Heikkinen, Richard Thwaites, Bosco Paes, Xavier Carbonell-Estrany, Dmytro Dobryanskyy, Merih Cetinkaya, Adel S Al Harbi, Ji-Man Kang, Anne Goh Eng Neo, Hsin Chi, Guilherme Sant’Anna, Mónica Villa Guillén, Gonzalo Luis Mariani, Marco Aurelio Palazzi Safadi, Soledad Urzua, Heather J Zar, Pierre Goussard, Barry Rodgers-Gray, Nicola Waghorne, Manuel Sanchez Luna

  • July 2, 2025

Related Content

Long-term epidemiological patterns of pediatric infectious diseases in an urban district of Shanghai, 2015–2023

Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of talaromycosis in children with novel and reported inborn errors of immunity

Fabricated Citations Are Reaching Medical Journals

A large audit of biomedical publications suggests fabricated references are increasingly appearing in peer-reviewed papers — often in ways that are difficult for reviewers and readers to detect.