Human–AI collaboration for dysphagia rehabilitation from effectiveness to implementation complexity: a systematic review - Report - MDSpire

Human–AI collaboration for dysphagia rehabilitation from effectiveness to implementation complexity: a systematic review

  • By

  • Wenwen Yang

  • Sufang Li

  • Yifei Du

  • Mengran Chen

  • Funa Yang

  • Fan Zhang

  • Ji Zhao

  • Yanqing Li

  • Xiaoxia Xu

  • June 10, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Collaboration Between Humans and AI in Dysphagia Rehabilitation

Overview

This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of AI-augmented swallowing rehabilitation in adults with oropharyngeal dysphagia, highlighting short-term gains in functional oral intake but noting significant barriers to implementation. The findings underscore the need for pragmatic trials and further research into sustained outcomes and diverse patient populations.

Background

Oropharyngeal dysphagia affects a significant portion of neurological and oncological patients, leading to increased risks of aspiration pneumonia and malnutrition. The global shortage of qualified therapists exacerbates the challenge of providing adequate rehabilitation. Human–AI collaboration in rehabilitation may offer a solution, enhancing treatment accessibility while maintaining clinical oversight.

Data Highlights

Study TypeParticipantsFindings
Systematic Review31 studies (1012 participants)Short-term gains in functional oral intake and physiological measures

Key Findings

  • AI-augmented interventions show moderate/low certainty in improving short-term swallowing outcomes.
  • Effects of AI interventions diminish within weeks after cessation of therapy.
  • Adherence to AI interventions declines sharply without clinician supervision.
  • Digital literacy and cognitive impairment are significant barriers to AI adoption in dysphagia rehabilitation.
  • AI algorithm performance validation is primarily limited to healthy volunteers.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider the potential of AI tools to enhance dysphagia rehabilitation while remaining aware of the limitations and barriers to implementation. Ongoing supervision and support are crucial for maintaining patient adherence and achieving sustained outcomes.

Conclusion

The integration of AI in dysphagia rehabilitation presents opportunities for improved patient outcomes, but further research is necessary to address implementation challenges and validate effectiveness across diverse populations.

Related Resources & Content

  1. DIGITAL HEALTH, Application of intelligent technologies for dysphagia risk prediction: A scoping review, 2026
  2. Frontiers in Digital Health, Artificial intelligence in rehabilitation: a review of clinical effectiveness, real-world performance, safety, and equity across modalities and settings, 2026
  3. Intensive Care Medicine, Approaches to Managing Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Acute and Critical Care Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2020
  4. Frontiers in Neurology, Machine learning models in post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review, 2026
  5. European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Swallowing Disorders guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia, 2021
  6. Surface electromyographic biofeedback versus neuromuscular electrical stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2025
  7. Complete IDDSI Framework
  8. European Stroke Organisation and European Society for Swallowing Disorders guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of post-stroke dysphagia - PMC
  9. Surface electromyographic biofeedback versus neuromuscular electrical stimulation for post-stroke dysphagia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content