Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Representation is power: traditional, hybrid, and digital recruitment results from a non-randomized clinical trial engaging adolescents
Outcomes of Traditional, Hybrid, and Digital Recruitment in Adolescent Clinical Trial
Overview
This study evaluated recruitment strategies in the Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results clinical trial, enrolling 483 adolescents and young adults. Digital recruitment accounted for the largest enrollment proportion (39.1%), but targeted hybrid methods yielded the highest inclusion of historically underrepresented groups (87.5%).
Background
Clinical trials are essential for advancing medicine but often suffer from participant samples that lack population representativeness, limiting generalizability. Historically, individuals of European descent have been overrepresented, while social determinants of health are underreported. Digital and hybrid recruitment strategies may improve inclusivity and reduce participant burden, addressing longstanding challenges in diverse trial enrollment.
Data Highlights
Recruitment Method
Number Enrolled
Percentage of Total
Underrepresented Group Proportion
Digital
189
39.1%
32.3%
Traditional
165
34.2%
48.5%
Targeted Hybrid
112
23.2%
87.5%
Key Findings
Digital recruitment strategies enrolled the largest proportion of participants (39.1%).
Targeted hybrid recruitment, combining letters and text messages, had the highest proportion of participants from historically underrepresented groups (87.5%).
Traditional recruitment methods accounted for 34.2% of enrollment with moderate inclusion of underrepresented participants (48.5%).
Quota sampling was used to balance enrollment by age, gender, race, and ethnicity.
The study enrolled 483 adolescents and young adults, with 55.1% aged 13–17 and 44.9% aged 18–21.
Clinical Implications
Employing a multipronged recruitment approach that integrates traditional, hybrid, and digital methods can enhance both enrollment targets and diversity in clinical trials involving adolescents. Targeted hybrid strategies may be particularly effective in engaging populations historically underrepresented in research, thereby improving the generalizability and equity of trial findings.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that combining recruitment strategies can achieve inclusive and representative enrollment in adolescent clinical trials. Targeted hybrid recruitment methods are especially valuable for increasing participation from underrepresented groups.
References
Engaging Adolescents in Decisions about Return of Genomic Research Results (NCT0448106)
by Taylor B. Harrison, Jessica A. Sinclair, Lisa J. Martin, Kristin Childers-Buschle, Holly Elder, Sunyang Fu, Hongfang Liu, William B. Brinkman, Melanie F. Myers, Michelle L. McGowan