Variability in Commercial Pricing for Standard Cardiovascular Services Among Four Major US Insurance Providers
-
By
-
Alexander P. Philips
-
Sanket S. Dhruva
-
Christopher Whaley
-
July 16, 2026
Variability in Commercial Pricing for Standard Cardiovascular Services
Overview
This study examines the variability in commercial insurance payment rates for common cardiology services among four major US insurers. Findings reveal significant differences in pricing, particularly for facility fees compared to professional fees.
Background
Commercial insurance covers approximately half of the US population, yet the lack of transparency in negotiated rates leads to significant price variability. This variability complicates efforts by regulators and employers to negotiate better rates and ensure cost-effective care.
Data Highlights
The study analyzed TIC price data for 32 common cardiology services from four major insurers, revealing substantial price differences across services and insurers.
Key Findings
- Facility pricing for cardiology procedures showed more variation than professional pricing across 25 of 26 services.
- Diagnostic imaging and stress testing exhibited the most pronounced pricing differences.
- The analysis included approximately 6.7 million unique price points for professional fees and 104,563 unique price points for facility fees.
- Prices reflect negotiated amounts between insurers and providers, including patient cost-sharing.
- The study utilized data from four major insurers, representing 78% of the commercial insurance market.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians should be aware of the significant price variability in cardiology services.
Conclusion
The findings highlight the variability in pricing for cardiology services among major insurers.
Related Resources & Content
- Drugs - Real World Outcomes, Springer, 2026 -- Treatment Patterns and Healthcare-Related Costs in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: Insights from a Large US Healthcare Insurer
- Pediatric Cardiology, Springer, 2023 -- Disparities in Congenital Heart Surgery Linked to Insurance Coverage in the Context of the Affordable Care Act
- Pediatric Cardiology, Springer, 2023 -- Challenges Without Advantage: The Role of Prior Authorization in Congenital Cardiology
- Ophthalmology Management, 2020 -- FINANCIAL FACTOR
- 2026 Methodology Manual and Policies of the ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines, American Heart Association, 2026
- Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis, PubMed, 2023
- CT coronary angiography guided treatment versus routine invasive coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Open Heart, 2023
- 2026 Methodology Manual and Policies of the ACC/AHA Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines
- Diagnostic accuracy of coronary CT angiography versus invasive coronary angiography for detecting coronary artery disease: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis - PubMed
- CT coronary angiography guided treatment versus routine invasive coronary angiography in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Based on findings from:
Commercial Price Variation for Common Cardiovascular Services Across 4 Major US Insurers
Alexander P. Philips, Sanket S. Dhruva, Christopher Whaley. Jama Network Open, 2026.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2851713
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.