Indirect cognitive mapping in glioma surgery in patients not eligible for awake craniotomy – how I do it
-
By
-
Patrick Vigren
-
Hans Lindehammar
-
November 7, 2025
-
0 min
Indirect Cognitive Mapping in Glioma Surgery for Awake Craniotomy-Ineligible Patients
Overview
This report presents an approach using indirect cognitive mapping techniques during glioma surgery in patients who cannot undergo awake craniotomy. By leveraging motor pathway stimulation and diffusion tractography, surgeons can preserve critical cognitive subcortical tracts while maximizing tumor resection safely.
Background
Glioma surgery requires careful preservation of eloquent brain areas, including subcortical white matter tracts involved in cognition and motor function. Awake craniotomy with intraoperative mapping is the gold standard for protecting these functions, especially speech and cognition. However, some patients are ineligible for awake procedures due to cognitive impairment or anesthesiological risks. Alternative strategies using indirect mapping and motor tract stimulation are necessary to guide safe resections in these cases.
Data Highlights
| Case | Tumor Location | Distance Motor Tract to Cognitive Tract (mm) | Stimulation Threshold (mA) | Extent of Resection | Postoperative Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Left frontal lobe (FA affected) | 6 | 6 | 95% contrast enhancement removed | No dysphasia deterioration |
| 2 | Left frontal lobe (near basal ganglia) | 12 | 12 | 99% contrast enhancement removed | No new neurological deficits |
| 3 | Right temporo-parietal lobe (right arcuate fascicle adjacent) | 10 | 10 | Total contrast enhancement resection | No postoperative dysphasia |
Key Findings
- Subcortical motor tract stimulation intensity correlates with distance to motor pathways (1 mA ≈ 1 mm), enabling indirect localization of adjacent cognitive tracts.
- Preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and functional MRI facilitate three-dimensional mapping of motor and cognitive pathways to guide resection boundaries.
- In patients ineligible for awake craniotomy, limiting resection based on motor stimulation thresholds effectively preserves cognitive function.
- Case series demonstrated high extent of tumor resection (95-100%) without postoperative neurological deficits using this indirect mapping approach.
- Brain shift during surgery limits the reliability of neuronavigation alone, underscoring the value of intraoperative electrical stimulation.
Clinical Implications
For patients who cannot undergo awake craniotomy, indirect cognitive mapping using motor pathway stimulation combined with preoperative tractography offers a practical alternative to preserve eloquent brain functions. Surgeons can use stimulation thresholds as anatomical landmarks to safely limit resection near critical cognitive tracts. This approach supports maximal tumor removal while minimizing postoperative deficits.
Conclusion
Indirect cognitive mapping techniques integrating motor tract stimulation and advanced imaging provide a viable strategy for glioma surgery in awake craniotomy-ineligible patients, balancing oncological goals with functional preservation.
References
- Duffau H et al. 2014 -- White matter pathways and cognitive functions in glioma surgery
- Mandonnet E et al. 2017 -- Awake craniotomy techniques and limitations
- Herbet G et al. 2016 -- Functional anatomy of the arcuate fasciculus
- Raffelt D et al. 2012 -- Diffusion tensor imaging in neurosurgery
- Sanai N et al. 2008 -- Corticospinal tract anatomy and motor mapping
- De Witt Hamer PC et al. 2012 -- Motor evoked potentials in brain tumor surgery
- Picht T et al. 2016 -- Electrical stimulation parameters for motor mapping
- Hervey-Jumper SL et al. 2019 -- Brain shift and neuronavigation accuracy
- Author Group 2020 -- Neurosurgical-anaesthesiological asleep-awake-asleep model
- Author Group 2021 -- Awake craniotomy contraindications and alternatives
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.