Autologous stem cell transplantation for pediatric solid tumors in a resource-limited setting: a single-center experience of 15 years - Report - MDSpire

Autologous stem cell transplantation for pediatric solid tumors in a resource-limited setting: a single-center experience of 15 years

  • By

  • Debabrata Mohapatra

  • Deepam Pushpam

  • Sameer Bakhshi

  • Ranjit Kumar Sahoo

  • Surender K. Sharawat

  • Sandeep Agarwala

  • June 16, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Pediatric Solid Tumors

Overview

This study evaluates the long-term outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in pediatric patients with solid tumors in a resource-constrained environment. The findings indicate a 3-year overall survival rate of 50.6% and event-free survival of 35.9%, highlighting the potential of ASCT in this demographic despite challenges in supportive care.

Background

Pediatric cancers have seen improved survival rates in developed countries, yet outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) remain suboptimal. This study addresses the gap in data regarding ASCT for pediatric solid tumors in LMICs, where access to care and supportive infrastructure is limited. Understanding these outcomes is crucial for improving treatment strategies in resource-constrained settings.

Data Highlights

ParameterValue
Median Age6 years (IQR, 4-16)
3-Year OS50.6% (95% CI: 36.8-62.9)
3-Year EFS35.9% (95% CI: 23.6-48.3)
Median CD34+ Cell Dose5.7 million/kg (IQR, 3.5-6.9)
Median Time to Neutrophil Engraftment11 days (IQR, 9-12)

Key Findings

  • Out of 92 patients, 69.6% were male, with a median age of 6 years.
  • High-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) was the most common diagnosis at 52.2%.
  • The median cryopreservation duration of stem cells was 16 days (IQR, 8-49).
  • Three-year overall survival rates varied by diagnosis: HRNB (48.5%), relapsed/refractory Ewing sarcoma (43.8%), and germ-cell tumors (56.3%).
  • Busulfan-melphalan conditioning showed better overall survival compared to carboplatin-etoposide-melphalan for HRNB and Ewing sarcoma (HR = 0.15, p=0.005).

Clinical Implications

The study provides valuable insights into the feasibility and outcomes of ASCT for pediatric solid tumors in LMICs. Clinicians should consider the specific challenges faced in these settings, including infection risks and supportive care limitations, when planning treatment.

Conclusion

ASCT demonstrates acceptable outcomes for high-risk or relapsed/refractory pediatric solid tumors in LMICs, suggesting its viability as a treatment option in these contexts.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. Neuroblastoma, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - PubMed
  6. Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial - PubMed
  7. Frontiers | Autologous stem cell transplantation for pediatric solid tumors in a resource-limited setting: a single-center experience of 15 years
  8. Neuroblastoma, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology - PubMed
  9. Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): an international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial - PubMed
  10. Frontiers | Autologous stem cell transplantation for pediatric solid tumors in a resource-limited setting: a single-center experience of 15 years

Original Source(s)

Related Content