Clinical Report: Exploring Patient-Reported Incidents in Electronic Health Records
Overview
This study investigates the impact of patient access to electronic health records (EHRs) on their engagement and emotional responses. It highlights both the benefits and potential negative consequences of EHR access, particularly among patients with mental health conditions.
Background
Patient access to electronic health records is increasingly recognized as beneficial for enhancing communication and engagement in healthcare. However, disparities exist in how different patient groups, particularly those with mental health issues, experience these benefits. Understanding the implications of EHR access is crucial for improving patient care and addressing concerns among healthcare professionals.
Data Highlights
No specific numerical data was provided in the source material.
Key Findings
['Patients with mental health conditions report greater benefits from EHR access compared to those without.', 'Access to EHRs can lead to increased anxiety and negative emotions among patients, particularly those with mental health issues.', 'Approximately 10-11% of patients, including those with cancer, report feeling offended by EHR content.', 'Healthcare professionals express concerns about the potential negative impact of EHR access on patient relationships and engagement.', 'Patients are generally willing to access their EHRs despite potential emotional challenges.']
Clinical Implications
Healthcare providers should be aware of the potential emotional impact of EHR content on patients, especially those with mental health conditions. Strategies to mitigate negative responses and enhance patient understanding of their records may improve overall patient engagement and satisfaction.
Conclusion
The findings underscore the need for careful consideration of EHR content and its implications for patient care. Balancing patient access with sensitivity to emotional responses is essential for optimizing the benefits of electronic health records.
Patients with cancer frequently incorporate complementary modalities into their care. A survey of 29 NCCN Member Institutions revealed details on how integrative oncology services are delivered, including the types of services provided, referral process, employment structure, and role of advanced practice providers.
Clinical researchers from Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center are among the experts invited to share insights and clinical best practices at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) 2026 Annual Conference March 27-29 in Orlando, Florida.
