“Who’s on Backup?”—Exploring Internal Medicine Residency Backup Coverage Systems: Findings from a National Survey - Report - MDSpire

“Who’s on Backup?”—Exploring Internal Medicine Residency Backup Coverage Systems: Findings from a National Survey

  • By

  • Emily S. Wang

  • Joel C. Boggan

  • Emily Leasure

  • Daniel Kim

  • Lydia Redway

  • Erica N. Johnson

  • Patricia F. Kao

  • Steven J. Durning

  • Mark Rasnake

  • May 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Assessing Backup Coverage in Internal Medicine Residencies

Overview

This nationwide survey of Internal Medicine residency program directors reveals the prevalence and characteristics of backup coverage systems. The findings highlight the challenges faced by residency programs in managing these systems, which are crucial for mitigating burnout and ensuring continuity of care.

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated physician burnout, particularly among those in high-stress specialties like internal medicine. Effective backup coverage systems are essential to support resident well-being and maintain patient care standards. However, literature on these systems is limited, necessitating a comprehensive assessment of their implementation across residency programs.

Data Highlights

No numerical data available in the source material.

Key Findings

  • Backup coverage systems are vital for supporting residents during absences due to illness or personal emergencies.
  • Residency programs have developed various ad hoc systems to manage coverage needs, often referred to as 'jeopardy' or 'sick pull' systems.
  • Inadequate backup systems contribute to resident burnout and 'sickness presenteeism'.
  • Implementation of structured backup systems can enhance resident satisfaction.
  • ACGME requirements mandate that coverage systems be nonpunitive and without expectations of reciprocity.

Clinical Implications

Residency programs should prioritize the establishment of formal backup coverage systems to alleviate resident stress and prevent burnout. By adhering to ACGME guidelines, programs can create a supportive environment that fosters both resident well-being and patient care continuity.

Conclusion

The findings from this survey underscore the importance of effective backup coverage systems in residency programs. Addressing the challenges identified can lead to improved outcomes for both residents and patients.

Related Resources & Content

  1. JAMA Network Open, 2023 -- Developing Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures for Internal Medicine
  2. Pediatric Cardiology, 2023 -- Educator Roles of Sonographers in Pediatric Echocardiography
  3. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2023 -- Perceptions of Internal Medicine Residents on Challenges and Supports for Delivering Optimal Inpatient HIV Prevention Care
  4. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Internal Medicine, 2025
  5. Pediatric Cardiology — Overview of Research Training in Pediatric Cardiology Fellowship Programs
  6. Flexible Duty Hours, Sleep, and Patient Outcomes | JAMA
  7. AMA: Physician burnout rates are falling, specialty gaps remain
  8. ACGME Program Requirements for Graduate Medical Education in Internal Medicine

Original Source(s)

Related Content