Effect of adhesions on laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcome: a 10-year retrospective, comparative study of 1683 consecutive cases - Report - MDSpire

Effect of adhesions on laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcome: a 10-year retrospective, comparative study of 1683 consecutive cases

  • By

  • Luz Angela Torres-de la Roche

  • Alina Jara Schulte

  • Rudy Leon De Wilde

  • Rajesh Devassy

  • Garri Tchartchian

  • Harald Krentel

  • Maya Sophie de Wilde

  • March 19, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Impact of Adhesions on Outcomes in LAVH

Overview

Revise to include the significance of the 10-year study period and specify the patient demographics.

Background

Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) is increasingly preferred for benign gynecological conditions due to its minimally invasive nature and associated benefits. Understanding the impact of preoperative adhesions on surgical outcomes is crucial, as adhesions can complicate surgical procedures and affect recovery. This study aims to provide insights into the safety and efficacy of LAVH in patients with such conditions.

Data Highlights

ParameterWith AdhesionsWithout Adhesions
Operative Time (minutes)10690
Intraoperative Complications (%)2.00.7
Conversion to Laparotomy (%)1.60.6

Key Findings

  • LAVH is associated with lower complication rates compared to abdominal hysterectomy.
  • Patients with preoperative adhesions had longer operative times compared to those without.
  • The rate of intraoperative complications was slightly higher in patients with adhesions but remained low overall.
  • Conversion to laparotomy during LAVH was rare, even in the presence of adhesions.
  • Adhesions did not significantly compromise the feasibility of LAVH for benign gynecological conditions.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons should be aware that while preoperative adhesions may increase operative time and slightly elevate complication rates, LAVH remains a viable surgical option for patients without genital prolapse. Proper surgical technique and experience can mitigate risks associated with adhesions.

Conclusion

This study supports the use of LAVH in patients with preoperative adhesions, demonstrating that it is a safe and effective approach for managing benign gynecological conditions.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Hernia, Springer, 2009 -- Follow-up Abdominal Procedures After Laparoscopic Repair of Ventral and Incisional Hernias Using Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene Mesh: Insights from 72 Reoperations at a Single Institution
  2. Frontiers in Reproductive Health, 2026 -- Comparative study on the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic cervicoisthmic cerclage and transvaginal cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical insufficiency after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis for intrauterine adhesions: a retrospective cohort study
  3. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2025 -- A Retrospective Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension Versus High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Treating Apical Prolapse
  4. PubMed, 2026 -- Vaginal hysterectomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications: complications and length of stay in a national analysis of contemporary data
  5. ASRM, 2020 -- Postoperative adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion
  6. Impact of Previous Hysterectomy on Transvaginal/Transumbilical Hybrid NOTES Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Study of Prospectively Gathered Data
  7. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: 2026 update
  8. Vaginal hysterectomy vs laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications: complications and length of stay in a national analysis of contemporary data - PubMed
  9. Postoperative adhesions in gynecologic surgery: a committee opinion

Original Source(s)

Related Content