Efficiency and Sustainability in the Skin Cancer Excision Pathway: Life Cycle Assessment and Process Map - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evaluating the Effectiveness and Environmental Impact of Skin Cancer Excision: A Life Cycle Assessment and Workflow Analysis

  • By

  • Zahra Ahmed

  • Alexander Zargaran

  • Sara Moeini

  • Sara Sousi

  • David Zargaran

  • Ann-Marie Quigley

  • Norbert Kang

  • Afshin Mosahebi

  • August 19, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Evaluating the Effectiveness and Environmental Impact of Skin Cancer Excision

Background

Skin cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy globally, with approximately 1.5 million new cases reported in 2022. The healthcare sector is responsible for a significant portion of global greenhouse gas emissions, with surgical practices, including skin cancer excision, being particularly carbon-intensive. Understanding the environmental impact of these procedures is essential for developing sustainable healthcare practices.

Data Highlights

No numerical data or trial data was provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • The healthcare sector ranks as the fifth largest contributor to pollution globally.
  • Operating theaters account for up to 25% of carbon emissions produced by hospitals.
  • Life cycle assessments can identify carbon hotspots in surgical pathways.
  • Process mapping can enhance the understanding of patient journeys and identify improvement opportunities.
  • Skin cancer excision practices need to be critically assessed to meet net zero targets.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare professionals should consider the environmental impact of surgical procedures, particularly in skin cancer excision. Implementing sustainability audits and life cycle assessments may help reduce carbon emissions in surgical practices.

Conclusion

Evaluating the environmental impact of skin cancer excision is crucial for developing sustainable healthcare practices. This assessment can guide efforts to reduce the carbon footprint of surgical interventions.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Smith L, The Health Policy Partnership, 2022 -- The nexus between climate change and healthcare
  2. University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS England, 2024 -- A world first in carbon net zero surgery
  3. Glynou SP, et al., Bulletin, 2024 -- Innovating in sustainability research: grassroot approaches to carbon footprinting
  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer -- Skin cancer
  5. World Health Organization -- Climate change and health
  6. Techniques in Coloproctology — Environmental Impact of Standard Treatments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  7. DIGITAL HEALTH — Use of digital health interventions by outdoor workplaces in Australia: A focus on skin cancer prevention interventions
  8. Surgical Endoscopy — Assessment of Environmental Effects and Financial Implications of Hybrid (Reusable/Single-Use) Instruments Compared to Single-Use Alternatives in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
  9. Surgical Endoscopy — Surgical tray optimization: a prospective and survey-based evaluation of environmental and economic outcomes
  10. Environmental Impact of Standard Treatments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  11. Assessment of Environmental Effects and Financial Implications of Hybrid Instruments
  12. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-HERC/MembersOnly/7.9d%20NCCN%202.2025%20BCC.pdf
  13. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/HPA/DSI-HERC/MembersOnly/7.9e%20NCCN%202.2025%20SCC.pdf
  14. Checking your browser - reCAPTCHA
  15. Wide local excision margins in melanoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis | Scientific Reports
  16. Mohs Surgery vs Wide Local Excision in Primary High-Stage Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma | Dermatology | JAMA Dermatology | JAMA Network
  17. Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for recurrent cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma - PMC
  18. Economic and environmental benefits of greening a Mohs surgery clinic: A comprehensive intervention and analysis - ScienceDirect
  19. carbon footprint of surgical and non-surgical skin cancer appointments | Clinical and Experimental Dermatology | Oxford Academic
  20. The carbon footprint of surgical operations: 2023–2025 systematic review update

Original Source(s)

Related Content