Staff perspectives on implementing opt-out blood-borne virus testing in English emergency departments: a qualitative study - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Insights from Staff on the Implementation of Opt-Out Blood-Borne Virus Testing in Emergency Departments in England: A Qualitative Analysis

  • By

  • Siobhán Allison

  • Tom May

  • Jonathan Roberts

  • Rachel Hill-Tout

  • Stephen Hindle

  • Matthew Hickman

  • Lucy Yardley

  • Rachel Todd

  • Robyn Heath

  • Jeremy Horwood

  • August 1, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Insights from Staff on Opt-Out BBV Testing in EDs in England

Overview

This qualitative analysis explores staff perspectives on the implementation of opt-out blood-borne virus (BBV) testing in emergency departments (EDs) in England.

Background

The UK aims to eliminate blood-borne viruses (BBVs) by 2030, necessitating the identification of undiagnosed individuals. Emergency departments are strategically positioned to implement opt-out BBV testing.

Data Highlights

No numerical data was provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • Opt-out BBV testing has been introduced in high-prevalence areas to meet the UK’s 2030 elimination goals.
  • Staff acceptability and engagement are critical for the implementation of the testing program.
  • Barriers to testing often stem from staff not offering the test rather than patient opt-out.
  • High public acceptability of BBV testing exists, but staff biases may affect equitable testing.
  • Effective communication and support for staff are essential to normalize BBV testing.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare professionals should prioritize staff training and awareness regarding opt-out BBV testing to enhance implementation. Addressing operational challenges and biases can improve testing rates and support public health goals.

Conclusion

The study provides insights into the implementation of opt-out BBV testing.

Related Resources & Content

  1. HIV Action Plan for England, 2025 to 2030 - GOV.UK
  2. Recommendations | HIV testing: increasing uptake among people who may have undiagnosed HIV | Guidance | NICE
  3. BHIVA, BASHH, BIA and RCEM joint working group: rapid guidance on opt-out blood-borne virus testing in high-prevalence and extremely high-prevalence acute medical settings and emergency departments – BHIVA
  4. NHS England » Blood-borne viruses opt-out testing in emergency departments in areas of high and extremely high HIV prevalence: good practice guidance
  5. Public health evaluation of BBV opt-out testing in EDs in England, 33-month final report 2025 - GOV.UK
  6. Open Forum Infectious Diseases — Ten-Year Results of an Opt-Out Bloodborne Virus Screening Initiative in an Urban Emergency Department
  7. Infection — Implementation and Outcomes of a Comprehensive Screening Initiative for HIV, HBV, and HCV in an Emergency Department Setting
  8. Open Forum Infectious Diseases — Common Missed Chances for Timely HIV Detection in a Standard Opt-out Testing Setting in Atlanta
  9. Open Forum Infectious Diseases — Retrospective Study on the Clinical Implications of Positive Blood Cultures in Emergency Departments: Insights from a Single-Center Investigation
  10. HIV Action Plan for England, 2025 to 2030 - GOV.UK
  11. Recommendations | HIV testing: increasing uptake among people who may have undiagnosed HIV | Guidance | NICE
  12. BHIVA, BASHH, BIA and RCEM joint working group: rapid guidance on opt-out blood-borne virus testing in high-prevalence and extremely high-prevalence acute medical settings and emergency departments – BHIVA
  13. NHS England » Blood-borne viruses opt-out testing in emergency departments in areas of high and extremely high HIV prevalence: good practice guidance
  14. Public health evaluation of BBV opt-out testing in EDs in England, 33-month final report 2025 - GOV.UK
  15. Understanding HIV testing in England: 2025 report - GOV.UK

Original Source(s)

Related Content