Outcomes, Indications, and Complications of Revisional Surgery Following Biliopancreatic Diversion in a High-Volume Surgical Center - Report - MDSpire

Outcomes, Indications, and Complications of Revisional Surgery Following Biliopancreatic Diversion in a High-Volume Surgical Center

  • By

  • PAOLO BOCCANELLI

  • ANTONIO VITIELLO

  • Domenico Benavoli

  • Michela Campanelli

  • Giovanna Berardi

  • Vincenzo Pilone

  • Paolo Gentileschi

  • April 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Outcomes, Indications, and Complications of Revisional Surgery Following BPD

Overview

This study evaluates the outcomes of revisional surgery following biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) in a high-volume surgical center, highlighting the primary indications for revision and the types of procedures performed. The findings indicate significant weight loss and a variety of complications associated with the revisions.

Background

Biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) has been associated with high rates of nutritional deficiencies and the need for surgical revisions, leading to its decline in popularity. Despite this, some centers continue to perform BPD, necessitating a better understanding of the outcomes and complications associated with revisional surgeries. This study aims to provide insights into the effectiveness and challenges of revisional procedures after BPD.

Data Highlights

ParameterMeanMedianRange
Age at Revision50.2 years48.0 years37.0–70.0 years
Weight Pre-BPD132.3 kg130.0 kg93–242 kg
BMI Pre-BPD48.6 kg/m246.5 kg/m237.6–86.6 kg/m2
Weight Post-Revision75.2 kg74.0 kg41.0–129.0 kg
BMI Post-Revision27.7 kg/m227.5 kg/m215.6–40.7 kg/m2

Key Findings

  • The mean age at revision was 50.2 years, with a mean interval of 17.9 years between primary BPD and revision.
  • Malnutrition/malabsorption was the most common indication for revision, accounting for 47.8% of cases.
  • Weight decreased by an average of 44.6 kg from pre-BPD to pre-revision and by an additional 13.0 kg after revision.
  • The most frequent type of revision was gastric pouch trimming, performed in 30.4% of cases.
  • Overall, the follow-up duration post-revision averaged 7.3 months.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should be aware of the high rates of malnutrition and weight regain in patients undergoing BPD, which may necessitate revisional surgery. The findings underscore the importance of careful patient selection and monitoring for nutritional deficiencies in this population.

Conclusion

Revisional surgery following biliopancreatic diversion can lead to significant weight loss and address complications, but it is essential to consider the high rates of malnutrition and the need for ongoing surveillance.

References

  1. Obesity Surgery, 2022 -- Evaluating the Long-Term Effects of Revisional Malabsorptive Bariatric Surgery: Are the Advantages Greater than the Risks?
  2. Updates in Surgery, 2025 -- Laparoscopic Revision Following One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Four-Year Experience from a High-Volume Bariatric Surgery Center in Northern Italy
  3. Obesity Surgery, 2021 -- Reoperative Procedures Following One Anastomosis/Minigastric Bypass: Insights from an Italian Multi-Center Study
  4. Surgical Endoscopy, 2021 -- Analysis of Reinterventions After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration: Insights from a Cohort of 5,740 Patients
  5. VA/DOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE, 2025 -- Clinical Practice Guideline for Obesity
  6. Malnutrition After Malabsorptive Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: When Should the Surgery Be Reversed? - PubMed
  7. VA/DOD CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE
  8. Malnutrition After Malabsorptive Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: When Should the Surgery Be Reversed? - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content