Partial Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Endocarditis With Management by a Multidisciplinary Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Partial Oral Versus Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Endocarditis With Management by a Multidisciplinary Team: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Partial Oral vs Intravenous Antibiotic Therapy for Infective Endocarditis
Overview
This retrospective cohort study compared outcomes of infective endocarditis (IE) patients treated with either intravenous (IV) antibiotics alone or partial oral antibiotic therapy, managed by a multidisciplinary team. Results showed no significant differences in 90-day relapsed infection or all-cause mortality between the two groups, supporting the safety and effectiveness of partial oral therapy in selected patients.
Background
Infective endocarditis is a serious infection with high morbidity and mortality, traditionally treated with prolonged intravenous antibiotics. Recent studies suggest partial oral antibiotic therapy may be noninferior to exclusive IV treatment, but adoption in North America remains limited. European guidelines have incorporated oral therapy recommendations, while American guidelines have not been updated since 2015. This study evaluates real-world outcomes of partial oral therapy in a US setting with a multidisciplinary team approach, including patients with substance use disorder.
Data Highlights
Outcome
IV Therapy Alone (n=143)
Partial Oral Therapy (n=93)
P Value
Valve Surgery Frequency
28.0%
40.9%
0.04
90-day Relapsed Infection
2.2%
0.7%
0.32
90-day All-Cause Mortality
6.5%
2.8%
0.17
Composite of Relapse or Mortality
8.6%
3.5%
0.09
Key Findings
No significant difference in 90-day relapsed infection rates between IV-only and partial oral therapy groups (2.2% vs 0.7%; P = .32).
90-day all-cause mortality was not significantly different (6.5% IV vs 2.8% oral; P = .17).
Valve surgery was more frequent in the partial oral therapy group (40.9% vs 28.0%; P = .04).
Multivariable analysis showed oral therapy was not associated with increased 90-day mortality (OR 1.72; 95% CI 0.41–7.24; P = .46).
Independent predictors of mortality included older age, acute heart failure, and discharge before medically advised.
No difference in outcomes for patients with MRSA transitioned to oral therapy.
Clinical Implications
Partial oral antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis, when selected and managed by a multidisciplinary team, appears to be a safe and effective alternative to exclusive intravenous treatment. This approach may facilitate earlier discharge and reduce healthcare resource utilization without compromising patient outcomes. Clinicians should consider patient stability, pathogen susceptibility, and multidisciplinary input when selecting candidates for oral stepdown therapy.
Conclusion
In a multidisciplinary care setting, partial oral antibiotic therapy for infective endocarditis yields comparable 90-day relapse and mortality outcomes to intravenous therapy alone. These findings support incorporation of oral therapy protocols consistent with European guidelines into clinical practice for selected patients.
References
Iversen et al 2019 -- Partial Oral versus Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment of Endocarditis
Freling et al 2022 -- Outcomes of Oral Antibiotic Therapy for Endocarditis in the US
European Society of Cardiology Guidelines 2020 -- Management of Infective Endocarditis
American Heart Association 2015 -- Infective Endocarditis Guidelines
by Sami El-Dalati, Bennett Collis, Takaaki Kobayashi, Evan Hall, Talal Alnabelsi, Chloe Cao, Meredith Johnson, John Gurley, Luke Strnad, Corey Adams, Victoria Weaver, Hassan Reda, Michael Sekela, Tessa London, Kara Kennedy, Armaghan-E Rehman Mansoor, David Olafsson, Grant Laugherty, Alyssa Tremblay, Angella Linder, Deborah Gill, Nicholas J Van Sickels, Alexander Pomakov, William Harris, Bobbi Jo Stoner