Investigating workload and usability of remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation - Report - MDSpire

Investigating workload and usability of remote magnetic navigation for catheter ablation

  • By

  • Florian Heemeyer

  • Leonardo E. Guido Lopez

  • Miguel E. Jáuregui Abularach

  • Beatriz Sanz Verdejo

  • Quentin Boehler

  • Oliver Brinkmann

  • José L. Merino

  • Bradley J. Nelson

  • December 15, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Remote Magnetic Navigation in Catheter Ablation Procedures

Overview

This study evaluates remote magnetic navigation using the Navion system compared to conventional manual catheter navigation in catheter ablation. Findings highlight improved usability and reduced operator workload with remote magnetic navigation, suggesting potential benefits in clinical practice.

Background

Cardiac arrhythmias are common and often treated with catheter ablation, which selectively destroys abnormal myocardial tissue. Manual catheter ablation is technically demanding and time-consuming, prompting the development of robotic systems to assist navigation. Remote magnetic navigation systems, such as the Navion, offer improved catheter stability and safety, but their impact on operator workload and usability has been underexplored. This study systematically compares these factors between remote magnetic and manual navigation methods.

Data Highlights

The study utilized the Navion electromagnetic navigation system (eMNS) capable of generating magnetic fields up to 25 mT, controlled remotely via a PlayStation 5 controller. Manual navigation employed the TactiFlex Ablation Catheter with direct mechanical manipulation. Both methods were tested using identical 3D-printed heart models simulating catheter ablation navigation. The remote magnetic system allowed operators in Madrid to control the robotic system located in Zurich, demonstrating telesurgery feasibility.

Key Findings

  • Remote magnetic navigation with the Navion system reduced operator physical demand and stress compared to manual catheter navigation.
  • Magnetically actuated catheter steering improved catheter stability and safety during navigation.
  • The ergonomic PlayStation 5 controller facilitated intuitive and effective remote control of catheter movements.
  • Remote operation enabled telesurgery, allowing electrophysiologists to perform procedures from a different location than the robotic system.
  • Both navigation methods used identical heart models, ensuring consistent evaluation conditions.
  • Robotic assistance demonstrated potential to reduce musculoskeletal strain and burnout risk among operators.

Clinical Implications

Remote magnetic navigation systems like Navion may enhance procedural efficiency by reducing operator workload and physical strain, potentially improving operator well-being and reducing burnout. The ability to perform catheter ablation remotely could expand access to expert electrophysiologists and improve procedural safety through enhanced catheter stability. Integration of ergonomic controllers supports usability in clinical settings.

Conclusion

Remote magnetic navigation offers a promising alternative to manual catheter navigation in ablation procedures, improving usability and reducing operator workload. These benefits support further clinical adoption and development of robotic catheter navigation technologies.

References

  1. Stereotaxis, Hansen Medical, Catheter Precision Inc. -- Robotic Systems for Catheter Ablation
  2. Navion System Technical Documentation -- Electromagnetic Navigation System
  3. Study Authors -- Evaluating the Efficiency and User Experience of Remote Magnetic Navigation in Catheter Ablation Procedures

Original Source(s)

Related Content