Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding the Immunogenicity of Enhanced Influenza Vaccines in Inducing Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibodies - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding the Immunogenicity of Enhanced Influenza Vaccines in Inducing Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibodies
Immunogenicity of Advanced Influenza Vaccines and Neuraminidase Inhibition Antibody Response
Overview
This correspondence addresses the immunogenicity of neuraminidase (NA) antibodies induced by advanced influenza vaccines in older adults. It highlights that NA content alone does not predict antibody response and discusses the limitations of using ≥4-fold rise in neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) titers as a sole endpoint in highly primed populations.
Background
Neuraminidase inhibition antibodies are increasingly recognized as correlates of protection against severe influenza. However, influenza vaccine formulations vary in NA antigen content, which is not standardized, and factors such as NA protein stability and conformation influence immunogenicity. The antibody response in older adults, who often have preexisting immunity, may be affected by high baseline antibody titers, complicating interpretation of vaccine efficacy endpoints.
Data Highlights
Vaccine Type
N1 Protein Content
N2 Protein Content
NAI Antibody GMFR (D0 to D30)
Standard-dose quadrivalent (SD-IIV4)
Reference
Reference
No significant difference
High-dose trivalent (HD-IIV3)
1.4-fold higher than SD-IIV4
5.1-fold higher than SD-IIV4
No significant difference compared to SD-IIV4
Recombinant quadrivalent (RIV4)
Measured but specific values not provided
Measured but specific values not provided
Not specified
MF59-adjuvanted trivalent (aIIV3)
NA content not quantified due to adjuvant presence
NA content not quantified due to adjuvant presence
Not specified
Key Findings
NA antigen content varies across influenza vaccine formulations and is not standardized.
Higher NA protein content in HD-IIV3 compared to SD-IIV4 did not translate into significantly higher NAI antibody responses.
NA protein stability and structural conformation influence immunogenicity beyond antigen quantity.
High baseline NAI and hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers can reduce fold-rise in antibody response postvaccination (antibody ceiling effect).
Using ≥4-fold rise in NAI antibody titers alone may misclassify protection status in highly primed older adults.
Comprehensive assessment including baseline titers and geometric mean titers is necessary to evaluate NA immunogenicity accurately.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians and researchers should recognize that NA content alone is insufficient to predict vaccine-induced immunity, especially in older adults with preexisting antibodies. Evaluations of influenza vaccine efficacy should incorporate multiple immunological endpoints beyond seroconversion rates to better assess protection. Future vaccine development and immunogenicity studies need to address the determinants of NA antibody responses to optimize protective effects.
Conclusion
The correspondence underscores the complexity of assessing neuraminidase immunogenicity in influenza vaccines and the limitations of current endpoints in older adults. A multifaceted approach is essential for understanding and improving vaccine-mediated protection against influenza.
References
Authors of original article (2023) -- Antineuraminidase antibody responses in older adults following enhanced influenza vaccines
Gao et al. -- NA enzyme activity and immunogenicity studies
Zhang -- Editorial correspondence on NA immunogenicity