Notch-referenced mediolateral verification of tibial tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 3D imaging validation study - Report - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Three-Dimensional Imaging Validation of a Notch-Based Method for Assessing Mediolateral Tibial Tunnel Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

  • By

  • Vu Tu Nam

  • Vu Duc Thang

  • Le Duc Huy

  • Luu Huu Phuc

  • Luong Nhat Anh

  • Le Duc Thinh

  • Chu Hoang Long

  • Nguyen Ngoc Huyen

  • Nguyen Duc Trung

  • Ta Van Thanh Nam

  • Ho Ngoc Minh

  • Tran Trung Dung

  • October 13, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: 3D Validation of Notch-Based Tibial Tunnel Assessment

Overview

The study proposes Notch-Referenced Mediolateral (NRML) Verification, an intraoperative visual method for assessing mediolateral tibial guide-pin position with the knee in full extension. It aims to validate tunnel placement by comparing postoperative 3D CT tunnel-center location with the native tibial footprint center measured on preoperative 3D MRI; the supplied material does not include study results.

Background

Anatomic ACL graft placement is intended to restore physiological knee kinematics and limit abnormal graft loading, impingement, and elongation. Non-anatomic tunnel placement is reported in up to 77% of revision cases, while mediolateral tibial positioning is difficult because the lateral edge of the native footprint lacks a consistently identifiable bony landmark. Remnant tissue may be absent or scarred, and tibial plateau anatomy varies, further complicating arthroscopic localization. Navigation and fluoroscopy are described as potential adjuncts, but their cost, operative time, and technical complexity may limit routine use.

Data Highlights

The provided article excerpt describes the study rationale and objective but does not report participant numbers, measurement results, or statistical analyses.

Measure or contextReported information
Non-anatomic tunnel placement in revision casesReported in as many as 77%
Native ACL tibial footprint centerApproximately 38–40% along the anteroposterior axis and 45–50% along the mediolateral axis of the tibial plateau
NRML validation comparisonPostoperative 3D CT tibial tunnel center versus preoperative 3D MRI native tibial footprint center

Key Findings

  • The study introduces NRML Verification, using the intercondylar notch as a visual reference for mediolateral tibial guide-pin position with the knee in full extension.
  • The stated study objective is to assess mediolateral tunnel-center deviation from the patient-specific native tibial footprint center using postoperative 3D CT and preoperative 3D MRI.
  • The authors hypothesized that NRML verification would yield minimal footprint-related mediolateral deviation and high measurement reliability between imaging modalities; the supplied excerpt does not provide results to assess that hypothesis.
  • The source reports that the native tibial footprint center is approximately 38–40% along the anteroposterior axis and 45–50% along the mediolateral axis of the tibial plateau.
  • A related article on transtibial ACL reconstruction describes concerns about reliably achieving anatomic tunnel placement with that technique; the supplied context provides no quantitative results from that study.
  • A related cadaver study evaluates customized 3D-printed guides for drilling precision, but the supplied context does not report its findings.

Clinical Implications

The source identifies mediolateral tibial tunnel localization as a challenge and presents NRML verification as a proposed intraoperative reference, but the provided excerpt does not establish its accuracy or reliability. The study’s stated imaging comparison may inform evaluation of the method once results are available.

Conclusion

NRML verification is presented as a notch-based approach to intraoperative assessment of mediolateral tibial tunnel position. The supplied material describes the validation objective but contains no outcome data from which to determine performance.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Year not provided — In vivo 3D CT Analysis Reveals Anatomical Limitations of Transtibial ACL Reconstruction Drill Tunnel Placement
  2. Year not provided — Evaluation of Customized Instrumentation in ACL Reconstruction: A Cadaver Study on Drilling Precision Utilizing 3D Printed Guides
  3. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, Year not provided — Analysis of Eccentric Bone Tunnel Widening Following All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Insights from Computed Tomography and 3D Modeling
  4. AAOS, 2022 — Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  5. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy — Comparative Biomechanical Analysis of Various Graft Positions in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
  6. AAOS Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  7. Transtibial ACL reconstruction produces higher sagittal inclination angles than the native ACL: A systematic review and meta-analysis of MRI-based measurements in 2047 knees
  8. Tunnel positioning assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 12 months: Comparison between 3D CT and 3D MRI. A pilot study
  9. AAOS Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  10. Transtibial ACL reconstruction produces higher sagittal inclination angles than the native ACL: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of MRI‐based measurements in 2047 knees - PMC
  11. Tunnel positioning assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 12 months: Comparison between 3D CT and 3D MRI. A pilot study - ScienceDirect

Original Source(s)

Related Content