Updated systematic review of current randomised controlled trials in chronic subdural haematoma - Report - MDSpire

Updated systematic review of current randomised controlled trials in chronic subdural haematoma

  • By

  • R. Fakhry

  • C. Yesildal

  • J. Bartek

  • J. Duerinck

  • T. S. R. Jensen

  • J. Soleman

  • C. Iorio-Morin

  • C. M. F. Dirven

  • R. Dammers

  • E. Edlmann

  • D. C. Holl

  • November 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Advances in Chronic Subdural Hematoma Management from Recent RCTs

Overview

This review summarizes findings from 95 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) management, including 41 published and 54 ongoing studies. Recent RCTs have influenced clinical practice, notably discouraging steroid use and highlighting emerging therapies such as tranexamic acid, statins, and middle meningeal artery embolisation (MMAE).

Background

Chronic subdural hematoma is a common neurosurgical condition predominantly affecting the elderly, with incidence rising alongside aging populations. Surgical evacuation via burr holes with drainage remains the standard treatment, though significant variation exists in surgical techniques worldwide. Non-surgical options and alternative interventions like MMAE are under investigation. Despite clinical practice guidelines, there is no consensus on optimal management, underscoring the need for high-quality RCTs to guide evidence-based care.

Data Highlights

CategoryNumber of Trials
Published Trials41
Ongoing Trials54
Total Trials Included95

Key Findings

  • RCTs completed since 2019 have demonstrated inferior outcomes with dexamethasone, leading to reduced steroid use in CSDH management.
  • There is considerable heterogeneity in surgical techniques, including drainage type/duration, anesthesia choice, and burr hole number.
  • Emerging pharmacological treatments under investigation include tranexamic acid and statins.
  • Minimally invasive procedures such as middle meningeal artery embolisation (MMAE) are gaining research interest.
  • Recent clinical practice guidelines acknowledge limited high-quality evidence and emphasize the need for further RCTs.
  • The number of CSDH-related publications and RCTs has increased significantly since 2019, reflecting growing research activity.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should reconsider the use of steroids in CSDH given evidence of inferior outcomes. Surgical management remains primary but should be tailored considering ongoing research into optimal techniques. Awareness of emerging therapies like tranexamic acid, statins, and MMAE may inform future treatment decisions as evidence evolves.

Conclusion

Recent RCTs have substantially advanced understanding of CSDH treatment, influencing clinical practice and highlighting promising new therapies. Continued high-quality trials are essential to establish standardized, evidence-based management protocols.

References

  1. iCORIC Collaborative Research Initiative 2019 -- Systematic Review of RCTs in CSDH
  2. Recent Clinical Practice Guidelines 2023 -- Recommendations for CSDH Management
  3. Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 Tool 2019 -- Methodology for Assessing Trial Quality

Original Source(s)

Related Content