Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer in a community-based setting: results from a prospective non-interventional study - Report - MDSpire

Long-term outcomes of active surveillance for clinically localized prostate cancer in a community-based setting: results from a prospective non-interventional study

  • By

  • Jan Herden

  • Andreas Schwarte

  • Thorsten Werner

  • Uwe Behrendt

  • Axel Heidenreich

  • Lothar Weissbach

  • September 30, 2020

  • 0 min

Share

Long-term Outcomes of Active Surveillance in Localized Prostate Cancer in Community Practice

Overview

This prospective non-interventional study of 329 patients with localized prostate cancer managed by active surveillance (AS) in a community setting demonstrated a 10-year overall survival of 86% and metastasis-free survival of 97%. Over half of the patients discontinued AS for invasive treatment primarily due to biopsy upgrades and PSA elevation, with no prostate cancer-specific deaths observed.

Background

Active surveillance (AS) is a curative-intent management strategy for well-differentiated, localized prostate cancer, involving regular PSA testing, digital rectal exams, and repeat biopsies to detect progression. Previous long-term studies from academic centers have shown excellent cancer-specific survival exceeding 98% at 10 years. However, data on AS outcomes in routine community urology practice are limited. The HAROW study prospectively evaluated AS in a real-world German community setting, where AS was relatively novel at the time of recruitment.

Data Highlights

ParameterValue
Number of AS patients analyzed329
Median follow-up7.7 years (IQR 4.7–9.1)
10-year overall survival86% (95% CI 81.7–90.3)
10-year metastasis-free survival97% (95% CI 94.6–99.3)
Deaths during follow-up28 (8.5%)
Prostate cancer-specific deaths0
Patients developing metastasis7 (2.1%)
Patients discontinuing AS for invasive treatment187 (56.8%)
Types of invasive treatment after ASRadical prostatectomy: 104; Radiotherapy: 55; Hormone therapy: 28
Patients switching from AS to watchful waiting50

Key Findings

  • Median follow-up was 7.7 years with a range up to 11 years.
  • No prostate cancer-specific deaths occurred despite 28 deaths from other causes.
  • Metastasis developed in 2.1% of patients after a median of 5.4 years.
  • 56.8% of patients discontinued AS for invasive treatment, mainly radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy.
  • Main reasons for discontinuation were biopsy upgrading and PSA elevation.
  • 50 patients transitioned from AS to watchful waiting, maintaining a non-invasive approach.

Clinical Implications

Active surveillance in a community urology setting yields excellent long-term cancer control with minimal prostate cancer-specific mortality, supporting its use outside academic centers. Regular monitoring with PSA and biopsy remains critical to identify progression warranting intervention. Patient selection and adherence to follow-up protocols are essential to optimize outcomes.

Conclusion

This study confirms that active surveillance is a safe and effective management strategy for localized prostate cancer in routine community practice, with low rates of metastasis and no prostate cancer-specific deaths over up to 11 years of follow-up.

References

  1. HAROW Study Group 2024 -- Long-term Effects of Active Surveillance on Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer

Original Source(s)

Related Content