Efficacy and safety of aumolertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis: a single‑center retrospective study - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Efficacy and safety of aumolertinib in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis: a single‑center retrospective study
Clinical Report: Aumolertinib in EGFR-Mutated NSCLC with Leptomeningeal Metastasis
Overview
This retrospective single-center study evaluated the safety and efficacy of aumolertinib in 79 patients with EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). Results demonstrated promising intracranial disease control and survival outcomes with manageable toxicity, supporting aumolertinib as a therapeutic option in this difficult-to-treat population.
Background
Leptomeningeal metastasis is a severe complication in NSCLC, particularly prevalent in patients harboring EGFR mutations, and is associated with poor prognosis and neurological decline. Conventional therapies have limited efficacy due to poor blood-brain barrier penetration. Third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as osimertinib, have improved CNS penetration and outcomes. Aumolertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI developed in China, shows enhanced blood-brain barrier penetration and reduced toxicity, but real-world data on its effectiveness in LM are limited.
Data Highlights
Parameter
Value
Number of patients
79
Median interval NSCLC to LM diagnosis
11.1 months
Aumolertinib starting dose
110 mg/day (93.7%), 165 mg/day (6.3%)
Prior systemic therapy
40.5% none, 59.5% received
Response evaluation criteria
RECIST 1.1 and RANO-LM
Adverse events grading
CTCAE v5.0
Key Findings
Aumolertinib demonstrated effective CNS penetration and activity in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with LM.
Majority of patients (93.7%) received 110 mg/day dosing, with a small subset receiving 165 mg/day.
Objective response and disease control rates were assessed using RECIST 1.1 and RANO-LM criteria, showing promising intracranial disease control.
Median progression-free survival and overall survival were improved compared to historical data with first- or second-generation EGFR-TKIs.
Adverse events were manageable, with toxicity reduced due to selective inhibition of mutant EGFR over wild-type.
Real-world evidence from this largest-to-date cohort supports the clinical benefit of aumolertinib in this patient population.
Clinical Implications
Aumolertinib offers a viable treatment option for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC complicated by leptomeningeal metastasis, providing enhanced CNS disease control and survival benefits. Its favorable safety profile and BBB penetration make it suitable for managing this challenging condition. Clinicians should consider aumolertinib in patients with LM, especially those with T790M mutations or prior EGFR-TKI resistance.
Conclusion
This retrospective analysis confirms that aumolertinib is an effective and safe therapeutic agent for EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with leptomeningeal metastasis, improving intracranial disease control and survival outcomes. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.
References
Zhang et al. 2023 -- Assessment of aumolertinib's safety and effectiveness in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC and leptomeningeal metastasis