Risk association and diagnostic value of body roundness index for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Risk association and diagnostic value of body roundness index for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic-related outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clinical Report: Body Roundness Index and Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Outcomes
Overview
This systematic review and meta-analysis of 93 studies across 13 countries demonstrates that the Body Roundness Index (BRI) is significantly associated with multiple cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) outcomes. BRI shows particularly strong risk associations and good discriminatory ability for metabolic syndrome, while its predictive value for chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and mortality is more limited.
Background
Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic (CKM) Syndrome encompasses interconnected metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular pathologies driven largely by visceral fat accumulation. Traditional anthropometric measures like BMI and waist circumference inadequately capture visceral adiposity and its risk implications. The Body Roundness Index (BRI) was developed to better quantify body fat distribution, especially visceral fat, and may improve risk stratification for CKM-related outcomes. Prior studies have focused on isolated diseases, but comprehensive evaluation of BRI across the CKM spectrum has been lacking.
Data Highlights
Outcome
Association with BRI
Diagnostic Performance
Metabolic Syndrome
Consistent significant risk associations overall and by gender
Good discriminatory ability in diagnostic meta-analysis
Chronic Kidney Disease
Significant but weaker associations
Limited predictive ability
Cardiovascular Disease
Significant but weaker associations
Limited predictive ability
Mortality
Significant but weaker associations
Limited predictive ability
Key Findings
BRI is significantly associated with increased risk of multiple CKM-related outcomes.
Strongest and most consistent associations observed for metabolic syndrome across overall and gender subgroups.
BRI demonstrates good discriminatory performance for identifying metabolic abnormalities.
Predictive ability of BRI for chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, and mortality is relatively limited.
BRI provides incremental risk stratification information beyond conventional anthropometric indices like BMI and waist circumference.
Further high-quality prospective studies are needed to define long-term predictive value and clinical utility of BRI globally.
Clinical Implications
BRI can serve as a valuable complementary tool to traditional anthropometric measures for early identification and risk stratification of metabolic abnormalities within the CKM syndrome framework. Its use may enhance clinical assessment of visceral adiposity-related risk, particularly for metabolic syndrome. However, clinicians should be cautious in relying solely on BRI for predicting chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events, or mortality until further evidence is available.
Conclusion
This comprehensive analysis supports the clinical utility of BRI as an effective anthropometric index for assessing risk of metabolic components of CKM syndrome, with more limited predictive capacity for renal and cardiovascular endpoints. Incorporation of BRI into routine risk assessment may optimize early detection and management of CKM-related metabolic risks.