Exploring 6 years of colorectal cancer surgery in rural Italy: insights from 648 consecutive patients unveiling successes and challenges - Report - MDSpire

Exploring 6 years of colorectal cancer surgery in rural Italy: insights from 648 consecutive patients unveiling successes and challenges

  • By

  • Roberto Santoro

  • Marta Goglia

  • Manuela Brighi

  • Fabio Pio Curci

  • Pietro Maria Amodio

  • Domenico Giannotti

  • Angelo Goglia

  • Jacopo Mazzetti

  • Laura Antolino

  • Antonio Bovino

  • Costantino Zampaletta

  • Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri

  • Enzo Maria Ruggeri

  • April 17, 2024

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Six-Year Surgical Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer in Rural Italy

Overview

This study analyzed 648 consecutive colorectal cancer surgeries performed over six years in two rural Italian hospitals. It highlights surgical outcomes, including morbidity, mortality, and the impact of emergency versus elective surgery in a rural setting.

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading malignancy worldwide and the second most diagnosed cancer in Europe. In Italy, CRC ranks second in incidence with significant mortality. Advances in multidisciplinary management, screening programs, and surgical techniques have improved survival rates. However, rural populations face disparities in access to care, higher emergency presentations, and worse outcomes compared to urban centers.

Data Highlights

ParameterHospital #1 (Cassino)Hospital #2 (Viterbo)
Population density (persons/km2)13090
Population served>300,000>300,000
Study periodJan 2017–Feb 2020Mar 2020–Dec 2022
Number of CRC surgeriesIncluded in total 648Included in total 648
Hospital levelSecond level, no major oncologic surgery experience initiallyFirst level, high-volume CRC center
Screening programStarted 2017Running since 2014
Multidisciplinary tumor boardOrganized during study periodEstablished since 2016

Key Findings

  • 648 consecutive CRC patients underwent surgery in two rural hospitals with no selection bias.
  • Emergency admissions and surgeries were associated with higher morbidity and mortality compared to elective cases.
  • Hospital #2, a first-level center with established screening and multidisciplinary care, demonstrated higher laparoscopic surgery rates and better perioperative outcomes.
  • Hospital #1 initiated a CRC surgery program during the study period, improving access to minimally invasive surgery and ERAS protocols.
  • Rurality impacted access to state-of-the-art CRC care, with challenges including delayed diagnosis and higher emergency presentations.
  • Implementation of multidisciplinary tumor boards and screening programs contributed to improved surgical outcomes in rural settings.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should recognize the challenges rural populations face in CRC management, including higher emergency surgery rates and limited access to specialized care. Establishing multidisciplinary teams, screening programs, and minimally invasive surgical approaches in rural hospitals can improve patient outcomes. Early diagnosis through screening remains critical to reduce emergency presentations and associated complications.

Conclusion

This comprehensive analysis underscores that rural colorectal cancer surgical outcomes can be optimized through structured programs, multidisciplinary collaboration, and enhanced perioperative care. Addressing rural disparities is essential to improve survival and quality of care for CRC patients in less densely populated areas.

References

  1. Global Cancer Statistics 2020 -- Colorectal Cancer Incidence
  2. European Cancer Statistics -- CRC Diagnosis Rates
  3. Italian Cancer Registry 2021-2022 -- CRC Incidence and Mortality
  4. Multidisciplinary Management and Survival Improvements in CRC
  5. FOBT Screening Efficacy in Early CRC Diagnosis
  6. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols in CRC
  7. Impact of Rurality on Cancer Care Access and Outcomes
  8. ASCO Rural Cancer Care Initiative 2018

Original Source(s)

Related Content