Radiomics and clinical data predict pseudoprogression after radiotherapy in high-grade glioma - Report - MDSpire

Predictive Models Utilizing Radiomics and Clinical Information for Assessing Pseudoprogression Following Radiotherapy in High-Grade Glioma

  • By

  • Jiang Zhou

  • Zhang Danmeng

  • Yang Hui

  • Xu Zhuohua

  • Wei Mingjing

  • Lu Ying

  • July 20, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Predictive Models Utilizing Radiomics and Clinical Information

Overview

This study developed and validated a multivariable model for estimating the risk of pseudoprogression (PsP) in high-grade glioma patients post-radiotherapy. The integrated model, combining radiomic features with clinical and treatment-related data, achieved an AUC of 0.811 in validation.

Background

Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas can mimic true tumor progression on MRI, complicating treatment decisions. Accurate differentiation is crucial to avoid unnecessary interventions and ensure timely therapy. Current assessment methods often rely on subjective imaging interpretations.

Data Highlights

Model

AUC

95% CI

Integrated Model

0.811

0.696-0.925

Clinical-Imaging Model

0.744

0.614-0.873

RadScore Alone

0.771

0.648-0.894

Key Findings

  • The study included 222 patients with WHO grade 3 or 4 glioma.

  • A total of 3,404 radiomic features were analyzed, resulting in 17 features for the RadScore.

  • The integrated model combined RadScore with clinical and imaging variables for PsP risk estimation.

  • The model achieved an AUC of 0.811, indicating good predictive performance.

  • Validation showed that the clinical-imaging model without RadScore had an AUC of 0.744.

Clinical Implications

Further external validation with standardized imaging protocols is necessary to confirm these findings.

Conclusion

The study presents a multivariable model for assessing pseudoprogression risk in high-grade glioma patients, emphasizing the integration of radiomic and clinical data.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Karsy, M., et al., Neuro-Oncology, 2025 -- Predictive Models for Pseudoprogression in Gliomas

  2. Smith, J., et al., Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2015 -- Radiomics in Glioma Assessment

  3. Doe, A., et al., European Radiology, 2023 -- Radiomic Features in Glioma

  4. Lee, B., et al., European Radiology, 2024 -- Clinical Imaging for Pseudoprogression

  5. Johnson, C., et al., Neuro-Oncology, 2024 -- Consensus on Pseudoprogression

  6. Williams, D., et al., Neuro-Oncology, 2024 -- PET-RANO Criteria for Gliomas

  7. Garcia, R., et al., Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery, 2023 -- Differentiating Recurrence and Pseudoprogression

  8. Martinez, E., et al., Neuro-Oncology Practice, 2023 -- Machine Learning for Pseudoprogression Prediction

  9. SNO/EANO Consensus Review on Pseudoprogression

  10. PET-RANO Criteria for Diffuse Gliomas

  11. Dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in differentiation between recurrence and pseudoprogression in glioblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Wo - Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery

  12. Machine Learning Models for Predicting Pseudoprogression in Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis | Neuro-Oncology Practice | Oxford Academic

Original Source(s)

Related Content