Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy vs. percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy vs. percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Clinical Report: Comparing PEID and PETD for L5/S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation
Overview
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the perioperative efficiency, clinical outcomes, and safety of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation. Findings indicate that PEID may result in shorter operative times and reduced fluoroscopy frequency.
Background
L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation is a prevalent condition that can lead to significant pain and disability. The choice of surgical approach is critical, as anatomical constraints at this level can affect the efficacy and safety of the procedure.
Data Highlights
Outcome
PEID
PETD
Mean Difference (MD)
95% CI
Operative Time
Shorter
Longer
-17.07 min
-26.05 to -8.09
Fluoroscopy Frequency
Lower
Higher
-8.94 counts
-11.40 to -6.48
Hospital Stay
Comparable
Comparable
0.38 days
-0.36 to 1.12
VAS Leg Pain
Comparable
Comparable
N/A
N/A
ODI
Comparable
Comparable
N/A
N/A
Complications
Comparable
Comparable
0.008
-0.019 to 0.035
Key Findings
PEID was associated with a significantly shorter operative time compared to PETD.
Fluoroscopy frequency was lower in PEID compared to PETD.
No significant difference in hospital stay duration between PEID and PETD.
VAS leg pain and ODI outcomes were comparable across both surgical approaches.
Complications and adverse events did not differ significantly between the two techniques.
Clinical Implications
The choice of procedure should be individualized based on patient-specific anatomical considerations and clinical context.
Conclusion
The findings indicate that PEID may be associated with shorter operative times and reduced fluoroscopy frequency compared to PETD. Further research is warranted to clarify these results given the high heterogeneity observed.