Economic Evaluation of the START Hospital Addiction Consultation Service
Overview
The START intervention significantly increased the initiation of FDA-approved medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during hospitalization and improved linkage to follow-up care post-discharge compared to usual care. The economic evaluation demonstrated that START is cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $15,750 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).
Background
Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a critical public health issue in the US, affecting millions and contributing to a high mortality rate. Despite the availability of effective medications for OUD, their use remains low, particularly in hospitalized patients. Implementing addiction consultation services like START during hospitalization presents an opportunity to enhance MOUD initiation and improve patient outcomes.
Data Highlights
Outcome
START
Usual Care
In-hospital MOUD initiation
57.3%
26.7%
Linkage to follow-up care
72.0%
48.1%
Incremental cost
$162
-
QALYs gained
0.0103
-
ICER
$15,750/QALY
-
Key Findings
The START intervention more than doubled in-hospital MOUD initiation rates compared to usual care.
Linkage to OUD-focused follow-up care was significantly higher in the START group.
The economic evaluation indicated that START is cost-effective from both health sector and societal perspectives.
The incremental cost of implementing START was $162 per patient.
The ICER for START was calculated at $15,750 per QALY gained.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare providers should consider implementing addiction consultation services like START in hospital settings to improve MOUD initiation and post-discharge care. The cost-effectiveness of such programs supports their integration into standard practice for managing opioid use disorder.
Conclusion
The START intervention demonstrates a viable approach to enhance the treatment of opioid use disorder in hospitalized patients, with significant implications for both clinical outcomes and healthcare costs.
Chemsex at the pharmacy counter. Gut bacteria tracking helmet impacts. PMD predicting psychiatric illness bidirectionally. This week's research keeps landing in the same uncomfortable place: medicine is improvising.