Patient-facing diabetic foot information from large language models: a domain- and source-balanced prompt framework for public-interface benchmarking - Report - MDSpire

Evaluating Patient-Centric Diabetic Foot Information Generated by Large Language Models: A Framework for Balanced Prompt Design and Public Interface Assessment

  • By

  • Yang Wen

  • Liyuan Chen

  • Jiaping Lan

  • Lin Chen

  • Lei Li

  • July 21, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Evaluating Patient-Centric Diabetic Foot Information Generated by LLMs

Overview

This study developed a framework for benchmarking diabetic foot information generated by large language models (LLMs).

Background

Diabetes-related foot disease is a leading cause of preventable complications, including hospitalization and limb loss. Timely recognition of risk factors and effective patient education are crucial for improving outcomes. The use of LLMs to generate patient-facing information presents an opportunity to enhance understanding.

Data Highlights

No formal numerical data or trial results were provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • The study generated a 24-item benchmark prompt set for evaluating LLM outputs.
  • Grok 4.3 achieved the highest scores in quality metrics such as DISCERN, EQIP, and GQS.
  • DeepSeek-V4 recorded the lowest readability scores and the highest mean FRES.
  • No responses met all predefined readability targets.
  • Visible transparency-related scores were low across all models.
  • No response was flagged as posing overt short-term harm (PCF 1 or PCF 2).

Clinical Implications

The variability in response quality highlights the need for clinician oversight in patient education derived from these models.

Conclusion

The study reveals significant limitations in readability and transparency in LLM outputs for diabetic foot education.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers in Digital Health, 2026 -- Assessing retina-specific ophthalmic counseling generated by an early public large language model across different levels of clinical urgency
  2. Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR), 2026 -- Fine-Tuning, Retrieval-Augmented Generation, and Hybrid Large Language Models for Postoperative Decision Support: Comparative Analysis
  3. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2026 -- Developing an expanded version of My Diabetes Care in English and Spanish: A design and formative usability study
  4. AACE Endocrine AI, 2026 -- Selective LLM use may improve electronic health record phenotyping accuracy
  5. PMC, 2026 -- Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026
  6. PubMed, 2023 -- Guidelines on the classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update)
  7. IDSA, 2023 -- IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-Related Foot Infections
  8. JACC, 2025 -- Management of Peripheral Artery Disease in Adults With Diabetes: 2025 ACC Scientific Statement
  9. IWGDF, 2023 -- Guidelines on Offloading for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
  10. PMC, 2025 -- Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Different Non-surgical Offloading Interventions for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
  11. ScienceDirect, 2026 -- Comparison of posterior slab cast with total contact cast in the management of diabetic foot ulcers
  12. IDSA, 2023 -- IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-Related Foot Infections
  13. IWGDF, 2023 -- Prevention guideline (2023 update)
  14. PMC, 2023 -- Risk factors associated with the recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis
  15. 12. Retinopathy, Neuropathy, and Foot Care: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 - PMC
  16. Guidelines on the classification of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update) - PubMed
  17. IWGDF/IDSA Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Diabetes-Related Foot Infections
  18. Management of Peripheral Artery Disease in Adults With Diabetes: 2025 ACC Scientific Statement: A Report of the American College of Cardiology | JACC
  19. Guidelines on
  20. Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Different Non-surgical Offloading Interventions for Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials - Yuxia Wu, Yiyuan Chen, Hui Wang, Suyun Dong, Hai-ou Yan, Juan Xie, 2025
  21. Comparison of posterior slab cast with total contact cast in the management of diabetic foot ulcers: A randomized controlled trial - ScienceDirect
  22. Prevention guideline (2023 update) - IWGDF Guidelines
  23. Risk factors associated with the recurrence of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content