Machine learning-based treatment outcome prediction in head and neck cancer using integrated noninvasive diagnostics - Report - MDSpire

Machine learning-based treatment outcome prediction in head and neck cancer using integrated noninvasive diagnostics

  • By

  • Melda Yeghaian

  • Stefano Trebeschi

  • Marina Herrero-Huertas

  • Francisco Javier Mendoza Ferradás

  • Paula Bos

  • Maarten J. A. van Alphen

  • Marcel A. J. van Gerven

  • Regina G. H. Beets-Tan

  • Zuhir Bodalal

  • Lilly-Ann van der Velden

  • December 8, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Predicting One-Year Survival and Feeding Tube Dependence in HNSCC via Machine Learning

Overview

This study developed machine learning models integrating clinical, blood, and MRI radiomic data to predict one-year overall survival and feeding tube dependence in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated surgically. The models demonstrated promising predictive performance, highlighting the potential of multimodal data integration for personalized prognosis and functional outcome prediction.

Background

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a prevalent malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Prognosis traditionally relies on TNM staging and HPV status, but these do not fully capture disease heterogeneity. Functional outcomes such as feeding tube dependence critically impact quality of life, necessitating accurate prediction tools. Advances in artificial intelligence enable integration of clinical, laboratory, and imaging data to improve outcome prediction and guide personalized management.

Data Highlights

OutcomeData ModalitiesModel TypePerformance MetricsStatistical Significance
One-year overall survivalClinical, blood, MRI radiomicsRandom forest classifierROC-AUC, PR-AUC, F1-score (median across 10-fold CV)p < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney U test with Fisher’s method)
Feeding tube dependence at one yearClinical, blood, MRI radiomicsRandom forest classifierROC-AUC, PR-AUC, F1-score (median across 10-fold CV)p < 0.05 (Mann–Whitney U test with Fisher’s method)

Key Findings

  • Integration of clinical, laboratory, and MRI radiomic features enabled machine learning models to predict one-year survival and feeding tube dependence in HNSCC patients.
  • Random forest classifiers trained with multimodal data achieved statistically significant predictive performance, as measured by ROC-AUC, PR-AUC, and F1-score.
  • Handling of missing data via multivariate iterative imputation and class imbalance with SMOTE and Tomek links improved model robustness.
  • Inclusion of additional postoperative treatments as a binary feature allowed assessment of their influence on prediction accuracy.
  • Radiomic features were extracted from volumetric segmentations of primary tumors on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images, providing quantitative imaging biomarkers.
  • SHAP values were used to interpret model decisions, enhancing transparency of feature contributions.

Clinical Implications

The study supports the feasibility of using routinely collected clinical, laboratory, and imaging data combined with machine learning to predict critical outcomes in HNSCC, such as survival and feeding tube dependence. This approach may facilitate personalized risk stratification, optimize rehabilitation planning, and improve resource allocation. Incorporation of such predictive models into clinical workflows could enhance decision-making and patient counseling.

Conclusion

Machine learning models integrating multimodal clinical data show promise in accurately predicting one-year survival and feeding tube dependence in surgically treated HNSCC patients. Further validation and refinement may enable their adoption for personalized prognostication and supportive care optimization.

References

  1. Global Cancer Statistics 2020 -- Head and Neck Cancer Incidence and Mortality
  2. TNM Classification and HPV Status in HNSCC Prognosis
  3. Radiomic Feature Extraction and Machine Learning in Oncology
  4. SMOTE and Tomek Links for Class Imbalance Handling
  5. SHAP Values for Model Explainability

Original Source(s)

Related Content