Impact of Stent Insertion on Short-Term Survival in Left-Sided Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Comparison of Bridge-to-Surgery and Emergency Surgical Strategies - Report - MDSpire

Impact of Stent Insertion on Short-Term Survival in Left-Sided Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Comparison of Bridge-to-Surgery and Emergency Surgical Strategies

  • By

  • Yasir Musa Kesgin

  • Sezer Bulut

  • Seymur Abdullayev

  • Burak Suskun

  • Ahmet Surek

  • Turgut Donmez

  • Alpen Yahya Gumusoglu

  • Deniz Guzey

  • Mehmet Karabulut

  • December 22, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Impact of Stent Insertion on Short-Term Survival in Left-Sided Obstructive Colorectal Cancer

Overview

This study evaluates the impact of stent insertion on short-term survival in patients with left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer, comparing bridge-to-surgery and emergency surgical strategies. Findings suggest that stenting may provide favorable perioperative outcomes, but the long-term oncological implications remain uncertain.

Background

Colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant proportion of patients presenting with obstructive symptoms requiring urgent intervention. The choice between emergency surgery and stenting as a bridge-to-surgery remains a contentious issue, impacting both immediate and long-term patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of these strategies is crucial for optimizing treatment pathways and improving survival rates.

Data Highlights

No specific numerical data or trial data was provided in the source material.

Key Findings

  • Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer globally, with many patients presenting in emergency settings.
  • Stenting is often used to relieve obstruction before planned surgery, potentially improving perioperative conditions.
  • There is ongoing debate regarding the oncological safety of stenting, with some studies suggesting it may lead to tumor progression.
  • Guidelines support the use of self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) as a bridge-to-surgery in the absence of perforation.
  • Recent trials indicate that stenting may reduce stoma formation and perioperative morbidity compared to immediate surgery.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should consider stenting as a viable option for patients with left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer, particularly when aiming for elective surgery. However, careful patient selection and monitoring for potential complications are essential to ensure optimal outcomes.

Conclusion

Stenting may offer significant advantages in managing obstructive colorectal cancer, but further research is needed to clarify its long-term oncological effects. The choice of intervention should be tailored to individual patient circumstances.

References

  1. Outcomes of Urgent Surgical Intervention for Perforated Colon Cancer with Total Obstruction Following Stent Placement as a Preoperative Measure, Surgical Endoscopy, 2018
  2. National Assessment of Preoperative Stenting for Left-Sided Colon Cancer Obstruction, Surgical Endoscopy, 2022
  3. Adopting a Stent-First Strategy for Acute Malignant Large Bowel Obstruction on Both Sides, Surgical Endoscopy, 2025
  4. Results of Self-Expanding Metal Stent Placement for Colorectal Cancer Obstruction: A Seven-Year Experience at a Swedish Tertiary Care Facility, Surgical Endoscopy, 2022
  5. Self-expandable metal stents for obstruction, ESGE Guidelines, 2020
  6. Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ESCO trial), PubMed
  7. Guideline Self-expandable metal stents for obstruc
  8. Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for malignant colonic obstruction: results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial (ESCO trial) - PubMed
  9. TYPE Review

Original Source(s)

Related Content