Integrated Care Models for Hepatitis C: Lessons From Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa - Report - MDSpire

Integrated Care Models for Hepatitis C: Lessons From Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa

  • By

  • Halder J Abozait

  • Nawfal R Hussein

  • November 10, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Innovative Integrated Care Models Accelerate Hepatitis C Elimination in LMICs

Overview

Integrated care models (ICMs) combining decentralization, task-shifting, and simplified protocols have demonstrated high hepatitis C treatment uptake and cure rates in resource-limited settings. Case studies from Rwanda, Cambodia, Malaysia, and Nigeria highlight scalable, cost-effective strategies aligned with WHO goals to meet 2030 elimination targets.

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects approximately 50 million people globally, with 75% of the burden in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Traditional specialist-dependent treatment models limited access, but the advent of pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) enabled simplified care pathways. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integrated care models incorporating decentralization, task-shifting, and service integration to expand diagnosis and treatment coverage. Despite progress, only 36% of infected individuals were diagnosed and 20% treated by 2022, far below WHO elimination targets for 2030.

Data Highlights

CountryKey StrategyScreened/TreatedSVR12 Rate (%)Projected Impact
RwandaLeveraged HIV infrastructure, task-shifting, decentralization7 million screened94Elimination by 2027; thousands of deaths prevented
CambodiaNurse-led primary care integrationRural pilot94–98.5High retention and feasibility in rural areas
MalaysiaNational screening, nurse-led testing, same-day test-and-treatRural drug users92.2+Near-universal treatment uptake
Nigeria (Nasarawa State)Integration into TB clinics, same-day RNA testing with GeneXpertLimited funding contextNot specifiedEfficient use of existing resources

Key Findings

  • Decentralization and integration of hepatitis C services improve access to diagnostics and treatment uptake.
  • Task-shifting to nonspecialist providers achieves cure rates comparable to specialists.
  • Simplified care pathways with minimal interruptions enhance patient retention and sustained virologic response (SVR).
  • Political commitment and leveraging existing health infrastructure are critical enablers for program scale-up.
  • Telemedicine supports re-engagement of patients lost to follow-up in decentralized settings.
  • Country-specific adaptations of WHO-aligned integrated care models have demonstrated feasibility and high effectiveness in LMICs.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians and health systems in resource-constrained settings should adopt integrated care models that decentralize hepatitis C services to primary care and utilize task-shifting to trained nonspecialists. Simplified treatment protocols and integration with existing programs such as HIV or TB services can enhance diagnosis, treatment uptake, and patient retention. These strategies align with WHO recommendations and are essential to achieving hepatitis C elimination targets by 2030.

Conclusion

Integrated care models combining decentralization, task-shifting, and simplified protocols offer a practical, scalable approach to hepatitis C elimination in low-resource settings. Successful case studies from Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa provide a roadmap for broader adoption to meet global elimination goals.

References

  1. World Health Organization 2022 -- Global Hepatitis Report
  2. Rwanda Ministry of Health 2018-2024 -- National Hepatitis C Elimination Plan
  3. Cambodia Pilot Study 2023 -- Nurse-led Hepatitis C Care Integration
  4. Malaysia National Screening Campaign 2023 -- Decentralized Test-and-Treat
  5. Nasarawa State Nigeria 2023 -- Integration of HCV Care into TB Clinics

Original Source(s)

Related Content