Comparative Analysis of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery for Pediatric Choledochal Cysts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - Report - MDSpire

Comparative Analysis of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery for Pediatric Choledochal Cysts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • By

  • Fei Liu

  • Ke Zhang

  • April 28, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Comparative Analysis of Robot-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery for Pediatric Choledochal Cysts

Overview

This systematic review and meta-analysis compare robot-assisted surgery (RS) and laparoscopic surgery (LS) for pediatric choledochal cysts (CC). RS demonstrated significant advantages in reducing postoperative complications and intraoperative blood loss, despite longer operative times.

Background

Choledochal cysts are rare biliary malformations that can lead to severe complications if not treated promptly. Surgical intervention is critical, with radical cyst excision and biliary reconstruction being the standard approach. The evolution of minimally invasive techniques, including robot-assisted surgery, offers potential benefits over traditional laparoscopic methods.

Data Highlights

OutcomeRSLSOR/SMD (95% CI)
Postoperative biliary stonesLower incidenceHigher incidence0.10 (0.01–0.89)
Bile leakageLower incidenceHigher incidence0.28 (0.11–0.70)
Anastomotic strictureLower incidenceHigher incidence0.27 (0.12–0.65)
Overall complicationsLower incidenceHigher incidence0.26 (0.13–0.51)
Total operative timeLongerShorter1.02 (0.30–1.74)
Intraoperative blood lossLowerHigher−1.22 (−2.19 to −0.24)

Key Findings

  • RS significantly reduced postoperative biliary stones, bile leakage, and anastomotic stricture compared to LS.
  • Overall complications were significantly lower in the RS group.
  • RS required a longer total operative time but resulted in less intraoperative blood loss.
  • RS led to shorter postoperative fasting time and hospital stays compared to LS.
  • No significant differences were found in other postoperative outcomes, including cholangitis and conversion to open surgery.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons may consider robot-assisted surgery for pediatric choledochal cysts due to its potential to reduce postoperative complications and enhance recovery metrics. However, the longer operative time should be weighed against these benefits, particularly in less experienced surgical teams.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted surgery presents notable advantages over laparoscopic surgery for pediatric choledochal cysts, particularly in minimizing complications and improving recovery times. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

References

  1. Surgical Endoscopy, 2025 -- A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Approaches for Pediatric Choledochal Cyst Surgery: Insights from a Single Institution
  2. Updates in Surgery, 2025 -- Evaluating Robot-Assisted Ladd's Procedure Against Laparoscopic Approach for Pediatric Patients with Congenital Intestinal Malrotation
  3. Surgical Endoscopy, 2025 -- Revised Analysis of Surgical Outcomes: Comparing Robotic and Laparoscopic Techniques for Neonatal Annular Pancreas
  4. Comparative Analysis of Short-Term Outcomes and Costs in Robotic versus Laparoscopic Approaches for Anti-Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2024
  5. Current Practice of Laparoscopic Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children -A Survey on Opinion and Experience Among IPEG Members, 2024
  6. Frontiers | Evaluating surgical strategies for pediatric congenital choledochal cysts: a multicenter retrospective study and network meta-analysis
  7. Current Practice of Laparoscopic Surgery for Choledochal Cyst in Children -A Survey on Opinion and Experience Among IPEG Members - ScienceDirect
  8. Comparison of laparoscopic and robotic surgery of choledochal cyst in pediatrics: single center experience | Surgical Endoscopy | Springer Nature Link

Original Source(s)

Related Content