Clinical Report: Exploring Patient Perspectives on Online Laboratory Test Results

Overview

This systematic review examines how patients engage with online access to laboratory test results, highlighting the importance of interpretive support. It identifies barriers to understanding and acting on results, particularly among disadvantaged groups.

Background

Access to laboratory test results via patient portals is mandated by law, aiming to enhance patient engagement and informed decision-making. However, many patients struggle to interpret these results due to a lack of contextual information and support, leading to confusion and anxiety. Understanding patient perspectives on this access is crucial for improving health outcomes and ensuring equitable care.

Data Highlights

No numerical data or trial data provided in the source material.

Key Findings

• Over 90% of patient portal users view their laboratory results.
• Access to results without interpretive support can lead to confusion and anxiety.
• Disadvantaged groups face greater challenges in understanding and acting on their results.
• There is a need for culturally and linguistically appropriate result formats.
• Clear communication is essential to prevent diagnostic errors and missed follow-ups.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare providers should ensure that patients receive not only access to their laboratory results but also adequate support to interpret these results. Implementing clear communication strategies and culturally sensitive formats can enhance patient engagement and reduce anxiety related to test results.

Conclusion

Improving access to and understanding of laboratory test results is vital for patient empowerment and effective self-management. Addressing the barriers faced by disadvantaged groups is essential for equitable healthcare delivery.

Related Resources & Content

1. Petrovskaya et al., 2026 -- Exploring Patient Perspectives on Online Laboratory Test Results
2. Enhancing Patient Empowerment through Digital Informed Consent in Surgical Practices
3. Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) — Understanding Patient-Reported Offenses in Electronic Health Records: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey
4. The ASCO Post — Lessons of 2 Decades' Experience with CHESS
5. Ophthalmology Management — Best Practices
6. Enhancing Patient Empowerment through Digital Informed Consent in Surgical Practices
7. Understanding Patient-Reported Offenses in Electronic Health Records: Cross-Sectional Mixed Methods Survey
8. Lessons of 2 Decades' Experience with CHESS
9. FINAL RULE OVERVIEW FACT SHEET 21st Century Cures Act: Establishment of Disincentives for Health Care Providers That Have Committed Information Blocking
10. Repeated Access to Patient Portal While Awaiting Test Results and Patient Messaging
11. Confidentiality in the Care of Adolescents: Policy Statement | Pediatrics | American Academy of Pediatrics