Clinical Report: Assessment of the CONSULT-PSYCHIATR Scale in Peru
Overview
The CONSULT-PSYCHIATR scale was evaluated for content validity, internal structure, and internal consistency in assessing reasons why workers in Peru may hesitate to seek psychiatric consultation. The study involved a large sample and utilized rigorous statistical methods for validation.
Background
Mental disorders contribute significantly to global disability, with many individuals not receiving adequate care. In Latin America, stigma and attitudinal barriers influence help-seeking behaviors, particularly in working populations. Understanding these barriers is crucial for developing effective interventions to promote mental health in the workplace.
Data Highlights
Measure
Value
Aiken’s V Coefficients
Most ≥ 0.70
Variance Explained
80.96%
Factor Loadings
0.8425 to 0.9365
Cronbach’s Alpha
≥ 0.70
Key Findings
The CONSULT-PSYCHIATR scale consists of 10 items assessing perceived barriers to psychiatric consultation.
Exploratory factor analysis revealed a one-factor structure explaining 80.96% of the variance.
High internal consistency was confirmed with Cronbach’s alpha and other reliability measures.
46.95% of participants provided constant responses, prompting sensitivity analyses.
Clinical Implications
The CONSULT-PSYCHIATR scale can identify specific barriers faced by workers in Peru regarding psychiatric consultation.
Conclusion
The validation of the CONSULT-PSYCHIATR scale provides insights into the reluctance of workers in Peru to seek psychiatric care.
by Christian R. Mejia, Gianella Vera, Oscar Mamani, Victor Serna-Alarcón, Jaime A. Yáñez, Neal M. Davies, María J. Erazo-Muñoz, Leonel Vega-Pérez, Camilo Vega-Useche
