10 Things I Wish I Knew Before My First Peer Review

By
Alessia Callegari
Sara Moscatelli
Colin J. McMahon
July 4, 2026
0 min

Pediatric Cardiology

Background

Peer review is essential for ensuring the quality and credibility of scientific literature. Despite its importance, many early-career professionals lack formal training in this process, leading to variability in review quality. Understanding effective peer review practices is crucial for maintaining the integrity of published research.

Data Highlights

No numerical or trial data presented in the article.

Key Findings

Reviewers should only accept manuscripts within their area of expertise to ensure meaningful evaluations.
Seeking mentorship can enhance the quality of reviews and support professional development.
Minimizing bias by avoiding knowledge of authorship promotes objectivity in the review process.
Declining review requests should not negatively impact future publication opportunities, but should be done thoughtfully.
Trusting one's judgment is vital for first-time reviewers to overcome impostor syndrome.

Clinical Implications

Early-career reviewers are encouraged to utilize available resources and mentorship to improve their peer review skills. A structured approach to reviewing can enhance both the quality of feedback provided and the reviewer's own understanding of the research process.

Conclusion

Developing effective peer review skills is essential for early-career clinicians and researchers. By following established recommendations, reviewers can contribute to the integrity of scientific literature.