Clinical Report: Comparing User-Driven and Interruptive Real-Time Tools for Medication Adjustments in Primary Care Settings
Overview
This study evaluates the impact of modifying a real-time benefit tool (RTBT) from a user-driven to an interruptive configuration on clinician engagement and medication order changes. Results indicate that the interruptive design significantly increased RTBT display rates and the frequency of medication adjustments by clinicians.
Background
Medication affordability is a pressing issue for many US adults, particularly those with multiple chronic conditions. Real-time benefit tools (RTBTs) are designed to provide clinicians with immediate cost estimates and alternatives at the point of care, potentially improving medication adherence. However, clinician engagement with RTBTs has been limited, necessitating exploration of design modifications to enhance usability and effectiveness.
Data Highlights
No numerical data available in the source material.
Key Findings
RTBTs are required for Medicare Part D plans since 2021 and will be mandatory in EHRs by 2028.
Clinicians typically view RTBT cost estimates in only 1%-10% of visits.
Changing RTBT design from user-driven to interruptive significantly increased display rates.
Medication order changes occurred more frequently with the interruptive RTBT configuration.
Clinician mistrust and time constraints are barriers to RTBT utilization.
Clinical Implications
Healthcare systems should consider implementing interruptive RTBT designs to enhance clinician engagement and improve medication prescribing practices. Increased visibility of cost information may lead to better patient outcomes through improved medication adherence.
Conclusion
The transition to an interruptive RTBT design appears to facilitate greater clinician interaction with cost information, potentially leading to more informed prescribing decisions. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impacts on patient outcomes.