The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019 - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
The negative aftermath of prostate biopsy: prophylaxis, complications and antimicrobial stewardship: results of the global prevalence study of infections in urology 2010–2019
Clinical Report: Post-Prostate Biopsy Infection Risks and Antimicrobial Management 2010-2019
Overview
This global study analyzed infective complications following prostate biopsy (P-Bx) from 2010 to 2019, revealing symptomatic infection rates and trends over time. It highlighted the impact of antimicrobial resistance on prophylaxis failure and emphasized the importance of antimicrobial stewardship in managing post-biopsy infections.
Background
Prostate biopsy is a frequently performed urological procedure with over one million cases annually in the US. Since the adoption of transrectal biopsy techniques, symptomatic infectious complication rates have ranged widely and appear to be increasing. Risk factors such as older age and comorbidities have been implicated, but remain incompletely understood. Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens has contributed to prophylaxis failure, underscoring the need for site-specific stewardship programs.
Data Highlights
Parameter
2010–2014 Cohort
2016–2019 Cohort
Number of Centres
174
84
Valid Cases
1204
411
Complete Outcome Data
1204 (74.6%)
411 (25.4%)
Median Age (IQR)
66 (61–72) years
66 (61–72) years
Repeat Biopsy Rate
19.0%
19.0%
Symptomatic UTI Rate (2010–2011 data)
5.2%
Not specified
Febrile Infectious Complications (2010–2011 data)
3.5%
Not specified
Hospital Readmission Rate (2010–2011 data)
3.1%
Not specified
Key Findings
Symptomatic infectious complications after P-Bx ranged from 1.9% to 27.7%, with an increasing trend over time.
Older age and comorbidities were associated with higher rates of infective complications post-biopsy.
Antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens contributed to failure of antibiotic prophylaxis.
5.2% of men experienced symptomatic urinary tract infection and 3.5% had febrile infections in early study years (2010–2011).
Hospital readmission due to infectious complications occurred in 3.1% of cases post-P-Bx.
Antimicrobial stewardship and site-specific protocols are critical to managing infection risks effectively.
Clinical Implications
Clinicians should be vigilant for infective complications following prostate biopsy, especially in older patients and those with comorbidities. Given rising antimicrobial resistance, tailored antibiotic prophylaxis guided by local resistance patterns and stewardship programs is essential to reduce infection rates and hospital readmissions. Monitoring and early intervention for symptoms of UTI post-biopsy can improve patient outcomes.
Conclusion
This large-scale global study underscores the persistent risk of infectious complications after prostate biopsy and the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance. Effective antimicrobial stewardship and individualized prophylactic strategies are vital to optimizing patient safety in this common urological procedure.
References
Borghesi et al. 2017 -- Infective complications after prostate biopsy
Global Prevalence Study of Infections in Urology (GPIU) 2003–2019 -- Antimicrobial resistance and infection rates
European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines 2020 -- Management of Infectious Complications
by Jakhongir F. Alidjanov, Tommaso Cai, Riccardo Bartoletti, Gernot Bonkat, Franck Bruyère, Béla Köves, Ekaterina Kulchavenya, José Medina-Polo, Kurt Naber, Tamara Perepanova, Adrian Pilatz, Zafer Tandogdu, Truls E. Bjerklund Johansen, Florian M. Wagenlehner