A decision tree analysis reveals significant interaction between tumor size and close surgical margins affecting outcomes in limb salvage surgery for high-grade osteosarcoma. - Report - MDSpire

A decision tree analysis reveals significant interaction between tumor size and close surgical margins affecting outcomes in limb salvage surgery for high-grade osteosarcoma.

  • By

  • Yingying Shi

  • Lan Wei

  • Qiyuan Bao

  • Junxiang Wen

  • Zhusheng Zhang

  • Zhuochao Liu

  • Qi Liu

  • Jie Chen

  • Xiaoqing Yang

  • April 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Interaction of Tumor Size and Close Margins in Limb Salvage Surgery for Osteosarcoma

Overview

This study analyzed 88 high-grade extremity osteosarcoma cases undergoing limb salvage surgery (LSS) with close peri-neurovascular margins (PNM). It found that close surgical margins (<2.4 mm) significantly increase local recurrence and reduce survival in small tumors, while large tumors have poor prognosis regardless of margin status.

Background

Limb salvage surgery is the preferred treatment for osteosarcoma, requiring adequate surgical margins for local control and survival. However, achieving wide margins is challenging near vital neurovascular structures, leading to close surgical margins (CSM). Prior studies on the impact of CSM have been contradictory, possibly due to tumor heterogeneity and complex interactions between tumor size and margin width. This study uses survival analysis and machine learning to clarify these relationships.

Data Highlights

ParameterFinding
Number of cases analyzed88 high-grade extremity osteosarcoma with PNM <15 mm
Close peri-neurovascular margin threshold<2.4 mm
Tumor size cutoff31.6% of limb length
Effect of close margin on local recurrenceSignificant increase in LR for small tumors with close PNM
Effect of tumor size on metastasis and survivalLarger tumors associated with worse metastasis-free and overall survival

Key Findings

  • Close peri-neurovascular margins (<2.4 mm) increase local recurrence risk in small-sized osteosarcomas.
  • Tumor size greater than 31.6% of limb length predicts poor prognosis regardless of margin status.
  • Decision tree analysis revealed a significant interaction between tumor size and margin width affecting local recurrence-free survival.
  • Conventional survival and ROC analyses confirmed the interaction effect on metastasis and overall survival, stronger than each factor alone.
  • Close margins near vital structures may be unavoidable but carry different prognostic implications depending on tumor size.

Clinical Implications

Surgeons should consider tumor size when evaluating the risk associated with close surgical margins in limb salvage surgery for osteosarcoma. For small tumors, efforts to achieve margins wider than 2.4 mm may reduce local recurrence and improve survival. In large tumors, prognosis remains poor despite margin width, highlighting the need for adjunctive therapies and close monitoring.

Conclusion

The prognostic impact of close surgical margins in high-grade osteosarcoma is modulated by tumor size, with close margins posing significant risk in small tumors but less influence in large tumors. These findings underscore the importance of individualized surgical planning and further research into underlying mechanisms.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, 2010-2015 -- Decision tree analysis of tumor size and surgical margins in osteosarcoma

Original Source(s)

Related Content