Equity and representation in oncology clinical evidence for FDA-approved treatments and the impact of COVID-19 - Report - MDSpire

Equity and representation in oncology clinical evidence for FDA-approved treatments and the impact of COVID-19

  • By

  • Hao Cheng

  • Jun Li

  • Ningying Mao

  • May 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Addressing Disparities in Demographics of Oncology Trials

Overview

This report highlights significant demographic disparities in oncology clinical trials supporting FDA drug approvals, particularly underrepresentation of women, Black, Hispanic, and older individuals. The impact of COVID-19 on participant demographics is also examined, revealing persistent inequalities despite regulatory efforts.

Background

Demographic representation in clinical trials is crucial for ensuring the generalizability and fairness of cancer treatments. Ongoing disparities in participant demographics can lead to inequitable treatment outcomes and hinder the applicability of trial results to diverse patient populations. Recent federal initiatives aim to address these disparities, yet significant gaps remain.

Data Highlights

Demographic GroupEnrollment Incidence Ratio (EIR)95% Confidence Interval
Women0.830.78–0.88
Black Individuals0.260.22–0.30
Hispanic Individuals0.500.44–0.57
Older Participants0.860.83–0.89

Key Findings

  • Women are underrepresented in oncology trials with an EIR of 0.83.
  • Black individuals have a notably low EIR of 0.26.
  • Hispanic individuals show an EIR of 0.50, indicating significant underrepresentation.
  • Older adults have an EIR of 0.86, reflecting ongoing disparities.
  • Trial characteristics linked to underrepresentation include industry sponsorship and use of overall survival as the primary endpoint.
  • COVID-19 did not significantly alter EIRs, but older adults and White individuals saw diminished representation during the pandemic.

Clinical Implications

Healthcare professionals should be aware of the ongoing disparities in clinical trial representation, which may affect treatment applicability. Efforts to enhance diversity in trial enrollment are essential for improving the relevance of oncology research outcomes. Clinicians should advocate for inclusive trial designs and support regulatory initiatives aimed at increasing participant diversity.

Conclusion

Despite regulatory efforts, significant demographic disparities persist in oncology clinical trials. Addressing these inequalities is vital for ensuring equitable cancer treatment and improving the generalizability of trial findings.

References

  1. FDA, Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies, 2024 -- FDA Guidance
  2. International Journal for Equity in Health, Racial, ethnic, gender and age representation of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of cancer therapies, 2026 -- Study Analysis
  3. The ASCO Post, Efforts to Broaden Eligibility Criteria for Clinical Trials Seek to Include More Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients, 2020 -- Article
  4. The ASCO Post, Negotiating the Obstacles to Conducting Clinical Trials of Immunotherapy During the Coronavirus Pandemic, 2020 -- Interview
  5. The ASCO Post, Race Reporting and Representation in Clinical Trials Leading to Cancer Drug Approvals, 2019 -- Study Overview
  6. The ASCO Post — Neighborhood Social Vulnerability and Its Influence on the Availability of Clinical Trials in Multiple Myeloma
  7. Diversity Action Plans to Improve Enrollment of Participants from Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Studies | FDA
  8. Racial, ethnic, gender and age representation of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of cancer therapies | International Journal for Equity in Health | Springer Nature Link
  9. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cancer Clinical Trials: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Experience (Alliance A152022) - PubMed

Original Source(s)

Related Content