Explainable machine learning for predicting venous thromboembolism in septic shock patients - Report - MDSpire

Utilizing Explainable Machine Learning to Forecast Venous Thromboembolism in Patients Experiencing Septic Shock

  • By

  • Yuanyuan Li

  • Qi Xin

  • Yizhao Lu

  • Xiaoyuan Yu

  • Chunyu Gu

  • July 20, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Utilizing Explainable Machine Learning to Forecast VTE in Septic Shock

Overview

This study developed and validated an explainable machine learning framework to predict venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients experiencing septic shock. The Random Forest algorithm demonstrated high accuracy, achieving an AUC of 0.9718 in external validation.

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients, particularly those with septic shock. Current risk assessment tools are often inadequate, highlighting the need for more precise, individualized prediction methods. Machine learning offers a promising approach to enhance risk stratification by analyzing complex clinical data.

Data Highlights

MetricDevelopment CohortExternal Validation Cohort
VTE Incidence17.74% (130/733)N/A
AUCN/A0.9718
F1 ScoreN/A0.7917
SensitivityN/A0.7037

Key Findings

  • The study included 733 patients in the development cohort and 257 in the external validation cohort.
  • Six predictors were identified: fibrin degradation products (FDP), prothrombin time (PT), white blood cells (WBC), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (CRP).
  • The Random Forest algorithm outperformed other models in predicting VTE.
  • SHAP analysis provided insights into the contribution of thrombo-inflammatory markers to VTE risk.
  • The model aims to enhance clinical intuition and risk assessment for thromboprophylaxis.

Clinical Implications

The developed machine learning model utilizes routine clinical biomarkers for risk assessment.

Conclusion

The study established a predictive model for VTE in septic shock patients. Further validation is necessary to assess its real-world applicability.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  2. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  3. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  4. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  5. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  6. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  7. Author(s)/Org, Source, Year -- Title
  8. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2026 | SCCM
  9. Dalteparin versus Unfractionated Heparin in Critically Ill Patients | New England Journal of Medicine
  10. Journal of Medical Internet Research - Machine Learning in the Prediction of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Original Source(s)

Related Content