Intra-cavitary radiotherapy for surgically resected brain metastases: a comprehensive analysis including an individual patient data meta-analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT) - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Intra-cavitary radiotherapy for surgically resected brain metastases: a comprehensive analysis including an individual patient data meta-analysis of intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and brachytherapy (IBT)
Evaluation of Intra-cavitary Radiotherapy Techniques for Resected Brain Metastases
Overview
This meta-analysis of 23 studies including 858 patients compares intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) and intracavitary brachytherapy (IBT) following brain metastasis resection. Both techniques demonstrate high 1-year local control rates (85–96%) and favorable safety profiles, with reconstructed individual patient data enabling refined survival estimates and direct comparison.
Background
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, affecting up to 12.1% of metastatic cancer patients. Surgical resection is standard for accessible lesions, but residual microscopic disease often leads to high recurrence without adjuvant therapy. Traditional whole-brain radiotherapy improves local control but has limited survival benefit and risks neurocognitive decline, prompting interest in localized radiotherapy techniques such as IORT and IBT. These methods deliver radiation during or immediately after surgery, minimizing exposure to healthy brain tissue and treatment delays.
Data Highlights
Parameter
Value
Number of studies included
23
Total patients
858
Median patient age
60 ± 3.46 years
Median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)
80 ± 6.50 (reported in 13 studies)
1-year local control rate (LCR)
85–96%
Study types
16 retrospective, 7 prospective
Key Findings
Both IORT and IBT provide high 1-year local control rates ranging from 85% to 96% after brain metastasis resection.
Reconstructed individual patient data from Kaplan-Meier curves allowed refined survival analyses and direct comparison between IORT and IBT.
Postoperative radiotherapy with IORT or IBT reduces the high recurrence rates (46–60%) seen without adjuvant treatment.
Both techniques minimize radiation exposure to healthy brain tissue and reduce treatment delays compared to traditional whole-brain radiotherapy.
Reported adverse events include radiation necrosis and leptomeningeal disease, but rates were generally low and manageable.
Study quality varied, with prospective studies scoring higher; limitations include non-randomization and heterogeneity among cohorts.
Clinical Implications
IORT and IBT represent effective localized radiotherapy options following surgical resection of brain metastases, offering high local control while preserving cognitive function compared to whole-brain radiotherapy. Their intraoperative or immediate postoperative delivery reduces treatment delays and limits radiation exposure to normal brain tissue, supporting their integration into multidisciplinary management of brain metastases.
Conclusion
This comprehensive meta-analysis supports the efficacy and safety of intra-cavitary radiotherapy techniques, IORT and IBT, as valuable adjuvant treatments after brain metastasis resection. Further prospective randomized studies are warranted to optimize patient selection and compare long-term outcomes.
References
Nayak et al. 2012 -- Epidemiology of brain metastases
Patchell et al. 1990 -- Surgical resection and radiotherapy for brain metastases
Brown et al. 2016 -- Neurocognitive effects of whole-brain radiotherapy
Liu et al. 2021 -- Methodology for reconstructing individual patient data from KM curves
NIH Quality Assessment Tool 2023 -- Observational cohort study evaluation