Standardizing Joint-Line determination on anteroposterior knee radiographs: multicenter validation of the adductor ratio and a novel composite index in 3000 knees - Report - MDSpire

Standardizing Joint-Line determination on anteroposterior knee radiographs: multicenter validation of the adductor ratio and a novel composite index in 3000 knees

  • By

  • Serhat Akcaalan

  • Ismail Duran

  • Mahmut Ugurlu

  • Salahulddin Abuljadail

  • Lina AlMudayris

  • Antonio Russo

  • Mattia Forgini

  • Moez Zeiton

  • Alexander Yan

  • Felipo Forero

  • Elliot Patarroyo

  • María Belén López Villagra

  • Ana Laura Bogado

  • Julius G. Pallera

  • Dexter R. Ramos

  • Daniela Seidel

  • Jorge Izquierdo

  • Kushal Hippalgaonkar

  • Niranjan Ghag

  • Gunes Ates

  • Mustafa Fatih Dasci

  • Mustafa Citak

  • February 2, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Validation of Composite Indices for Joint-Line Assessment in 3000 Knee Radiographs

Overview

This multicenter study analyzed 3,000 anteroposterior knee radiographs from ten countries to validate existing joint line (JL) measurement indices and develop new composite indices less influenced by demographic variables. Measurements focused on distances from anatomical landmarks and femoral width, revealing variability based on age, gender, and region, and supporting the creation of more reliable JL assessment methods.

Background

Restoring the joint line to its normal anatomical position after knee arthroplasty is crucial for optimal clinical outcomes. Even small deviations of 2-5 mm can cause instability, pain, limited range of motion, and increased risk of aseptic loosening. Various anatomical landmarks such as the fibular head, femoral epicondyles, and adductor tubercle are used for JL measurement on AP knee radiographs. However, no universally accepted method exists, and demographic factors may influence measurement reliability.

Data Highlights

ParameterDescriptionMeasurement Method
ATJLAdductor tubercle to joint line distancePerpendicular distance from adductor tubercle to JL
FWFemoral widthDistance between medial and lateral epicondyles
FHJLFibular head to joint line distancePerpendicular distance from fibular head to JL
MEJLMedial epicondyle to joint line distancePerpendicular distance from medial epicondyle to JL
LEJLLateral epicondyle to joint line distancePerpendicular distance from lateral epicondyle to JL
IndicesRatios of above distances to femoral widthATJL/FW, FHJL/FW, MEJL/FW, LEJL/FW

Key Findings

  • Joint line displacement as small as 2 mm can cause clinical changes; 5 mm displacement leads to instability.
  • Proximal JL shift increases patellofemoral forces, anterior knee pain, polyethylene wear, and aseptic loosening risk.
  • Distal JL shift causes mid-flexion instability, limited range of motion, and aseptic loosening risk.
  • Existing JL measurement indices vary with age, gender, and geographic region.
  • Composite indices (JL-AF and JL-Combine) were developed to reduce demographic influence on JL assessment.
  • Radiographs from 3,000 knees across ten countries were analyzed, ensuring diverse demographic representation.

Clinical Implications

Accurate joint line restoration is essential to prevent postoperative complications such as instability and pain. Clinicians should consider demographic variability when using existing JL measurement indices. The newly developed composite indices may provide more reliable assessments across diverse patient populations, aiding surgical planning and postoperative evaluation.

Conclusion

This large multicenter study validates the variability of existing joint line measurement methods and introduces composite indices that minimize demographic influences, potentially improving the accuracy of joint line assessment in knee arthroplasty.

References

  1. Introduction References 1-20 -- Various studies on joint line importance and measurement

Original Source(s)

Related Content