Multimodal physiological correlates of surgeon stress in live robot-assisted surgery - Report - MDSpire

Multimodal physiological correlates of surgeon stress in live robot-assisted surgery

  • By

  • Kaiqi Wei

  • Nanako Nakamura

  • Megumi Shimura

  • Yoshihiro Shimomura

  • Xue Zhao

  • Takaaki Tamura

  • Shinichi Sakamoto

  • June 30, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Physiological Factors Associated with Surgeon Stress During Live Robot-Assisted Surgical Procedures

Overview

This study investigates the physiological factors associated with surgeon stress during live robot-assisted surgical procedures. Using multimodal physiological recordings and retrospective stress ratings, the research aims to identify physiological metrics linked to perceived stress among surgeons.

Background

Surgeon stress during robot-assisted surgery (RAS) is a critical factor that can influence surgical performance and patient safety. The complexity of RAS requires sustained attention and fine motor control, making it essential to understand how stress impacts surgeons in real-time. Current literature lacks robust evidence on physiological metrics that track perceived stress effectively during live surgical procedures.

Data Highlights

The source material does not provide numerical data or trial results, which limits the ability to quantify findings.

Key Findings

  • Surgeon stress is defined as the subjective response to mismatches between task demands and coping resources.
  • Excessive stress can negatively affect attention, motor control, and team communication during surgery.
  • Multimodal measurement of physiological responses may provide a more comprehensive understanding of perceived stress.
  • Prior studies have often relied on simulations, which do not fully capture the real surgical environment.
  • Intraoperative stress assessment tools are needed to monitor short-term fluctuations in stress levels effectively.

Clinical Implications

Understanding the physiological correlates of surgeon stress can help develop monitoring tools for real-time assessment during surgeries.

Conclusion

The study highlights the importance of identifying physiological metrics that correlate with perceived stress among surgeons during live RAS.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024 -- Impact of Stress on Surgical Outcomes: A Comprehensive Review
  2. Surgical Endoscopy, 2024 -- Examining Stress, Anxiety, and Workload in Surgeons: Insights from Participant Feedback on Laparoscopic Surgery Fundamentals Exercises
  3. Addressing Misconceptions Regarding Intraoperative Stress and Surgical Performance: A Response, 2011
  4. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2022 -- Is Robot Assistance Essential for All Minimal Access Surgical Procedures? A Comprehensive Review of Musculoskeletal and Cognitive Challenges in Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery
  5. American College of Surgeons Releases First-Ever Workplace Standards Framework | ACS, 2026
  6. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Heart Rate Variability in Assessing Surgeons’ Stress Levels, MDPI
  7. Frontiers | Measuring and reducing surgical staff stress in a realistic operating room setting using EDA monitoring and smart hearing protection
  8. American College of Surgeons Releases First-Ever Workplace Standards Framework | ACS
  9. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Heart Rate Variability in Assessing Surgeons’ Stress Levels | MDPI
  10. Frontiers | Measuring and reducing surgical staff stress in a realistic operating room setting using EDA monitoring and smart hearing protection

Original Source(s)

Related Content