Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting beads versus conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Report - MDSpire

Comparative Analysis of Drug-Eluting Beads and Standard Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • By

  • Zezhong Gong

  • Yali Liu

  • Yusheng Song

  • Xinghai Li

  • Yunfei Tian

  • Jing Li

  • Chaoyi Qi

  • July 21, 2026

Share

Clinical Report: Comparative Analysis of Drug-Eluting Beads and Standard Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization for Lung Cancer

Overview

This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization (cBACE) in lung cancer patients.

Background

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, particularly in China. Conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization (cBACE) has been used as a palliative treatment for unresectable lung cancer.

Data Highlights

Outcome1-3 Months6 Months
Overall Response Rate (ORR)OR = 5.38 (95% CI: 2.30–12.60)OR = 4.18 (95% CI: 1.90–9.19)
Disease Control Rate (DCR)OR = 7.00 (95% CI: 1.99–24.60)OR = 5.40 (95% CI: 2.14–13.62)

Key Findings

  • DEB-BACE showed a higher pooled ORR at 1–3 months and 6 months compared to cBACE.
  • DEB-BACE was associated with a higher pooled DCR at both 1–3 months and 6 months.
  • No significant differences in adverse events such as hemoptysis, fever, or nausea/vomiting were observed between DEB-BACE and cBACE.
  • The evidence is based on five studies from China involving 221 patients.

Clinical Implications

The findings suggest that DEB-BACE may provide superior short-term tumor response in lung cancer patients compared to cBACE, without a corresponding increase in adverse events. Clinicians should consider these results when evaluating treatment options for patients with unresectable lung cancer.

Conclusion

DEB-BACE appears to offer enhanced efficacy over cBACE in the short term for lung cancer treatment, though further research is needed to validate these findings.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Frontiers in Oncology, 2026 -- Comparison between drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization versus conventional TACE in elderly patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases: a cohort study
  2. Frontiers in Immunology, 2026 -- Sequential tislelizumab plus bronchial arterial chemoembolization and systemic chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC with bulky tumors: efficacy and safety
  3. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 7.2025 - PubMed
  4. Safety and Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Embolic Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
  5. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine — Drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with lesion-specific insights
  6. European Radiology — Safety and Efficacy of Small Particle Bronchial Artery Embolization: Insights from a 12-Year Single-Center Study
  7. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 7.2025 - PubMed
  8. Safety and Effectiveness of Drug-Eluting Embolic Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization for Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis - PubMed
  9. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Bronchial Artery Embolisation - PMC

Original Source(s)

Related Content