Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health Services: A Scoping Review
-
By
-
Carly Hudson
-
Thuy Linh Phan
-
Marcus Randall
-
September 11, 2026
Clinical Report: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on AI in Mental Health
Overview
This scoping review explores healthcare professionals' perspectives on integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into mental health services, highlighting key themes such as ethical considerations, clinician trust, and the impact on patient care.
Background
The integration of AI in healthcare is rapidly evolving, particularly in mental health, where the complexities of patient care present unique challenges. Clinicians' perspectives are crucial for the successful implementation of AI technologies, as their acceptance and trust directly influence the adoption of these tools. Ethical considerations, including patient autonomy and data security, are paramount in ensuring that AI enhances rather than undermines the therapeutic relationship.
Data Highlights
The review indicates that no numerical data or trial results were provided in the source material.
Key Findings
- AI implementation in mental health raises concerns about professional responsibility and patient autonomy, as noted in the literature.
- Clinicians' trust and understanding of AI limitations are critical for its acceptance in practice, supported by various studies.
- Inappropriate AI advice could negatively impact patient safety and engagement in therapy, as highlighted in the review.
- Confidentiality and data security are significant concerns during AI system implementation in mental health, according to the findings.
- Healthcare professionals' perspectives shape the adoption or resistance to AI tools in clinical settings, as discussed in the review.
Clinical Implications
The review emphasizes the need for ongoing education and transparency regarding AI capabilities and limitations to foster acceptance among clinicians.
Conclusion
The perspectives of healthcare professionals are vital in navigating the complexities of AI integration in mental health services, as they directly influence the effectiveness and safety of technological advancements.
Related Resources & Content
- Xie Y, Zhai Y, Lu G, Front Med (Lausanne), 2024 -- Evolution of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a 30-year bibliometric study
- Hudson C, et al., Artif Intell Health, 2026 -- Use of natural language processing in the emergency department: a clinical overview on the state of the art
- Hipgrave L, et al., Front Digit Health, 2025 -- Balancing risks and benefits: clinicians’ perspectives on the use of generative AI chatbots in mental healthcare
- Putica A, et al., Psychol Med, 2025 -- Ethical decision-making for AI in mental health: the Integrated Ethical Approach for Computational Psychiatry (IEACP) framework
- Scipion CEA, et al., BMJ Open, 2025 -- Barriers to and facilitators of clinician acceptance and use of artificial intelligence in healthcare settings: a scoping review
- aace endocrine ai — Scoping review identifies what makes physician-AI collaboration succeed
- DIGITAL HEALTH — Artificial intelligence in Malaysian health practice: Perspectives from allied health professionals
- Frontiers in Digital Health — Perspectives on healthcare artificial intelligence policy from health equity professionals: findings from an interview study
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) — Patient Concerns Regarding Artificial Intelligence Applications in Health Care: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis Based on Social Ecological Theory
- WHO releases AI ethics and governance guidance for large multi-modal models
- Position Statement on the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Services and Treatment
- Ethical guidance for AI in the professional practice of health service psychology
- Transcript for CDRH Webinar Final Guidance: Marketing Submission Recommendations for a Predetermined Change Control Plan for Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Device Software Functions
- Artificial Intelligence in healthcare - Public Health - European Commission
- Evidence standards framework (ESF) for digital health technologies | NICE
- Clinical Reach into the Cognitive Space (CRITiCS): outline conceptual framework for safe use of generative artificial intelligence in mental health decision-making - PMC
- The therapeutic effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based chatbots in alleviation of depressive and anxiety symptoms in short-course treatments: A systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
- Effectiveness of AI and rule-based conversational agents for depression, anxiety and stress: A meta-analysis | npj Digital Medicine
- Efficacy of a Conversational AI Agent for Psychiatric Symptoms and Digital Therapeutic Alliance: A Randomized Clinical Trial | Trials | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
- Randomized Trial of a Generative AI Chatbot for Mental Health Treatment | NEJM AI
- Machine learning in the prediction of treatment response for emotional disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
- Systematic review and meta analysis of chatbots in the management of depressive and anxiety symptoms - PMC
- AI Act | Shaping Europe’s digital future
- Building robust, proportionate, and timely approaches to regulation and evaluation of digital mental health technologies - The Lancet Digital Health
Based on findings from:
Clinicians’ Attitudes and Perceptions on the Adoption of AI in Mental Health Care: Scoping Review
Carly Hudson, Thuy Linh Phan, Marcus Randall. Journal Of Medical Internet Research, 2026.
https://www.jmir.org/2026/1/e92370
This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.