Feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit after neurosurgical craniotomy: a protocol for a single-arm, single-center exploratory prospective study - Report - MDSpire

Feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit after neurosurgical craniotomy: a protocol for a single-arm, single-center exploratory prospective study

  • By

  • Yu-Mei Wang

  • Ying Tian

  • Shu-Ya Wang

  • Guang-Qiang Chen

  • Guang-Zhi Shi

  • June 10, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Assessing Safety of Analgesia-First Approach in ICU

Overview

This study investigates the feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in adult neurosurgical patients in the ICU. The primary endpoint focuses on successful protocol management within the first 24 hours post-initiation.

Background

Effective pain management and sedation are critical in the ICU, particularly for neurosurgical patients who may experience agitation that complicates their recovery. Minimizing hypnotic sedation can enhance patient assessment and reduce adverse outcomes, yet specific safety considerations for neurocritical care patients must be addressed. This study aims to fill the gap in understanding the implications of an analgesia-first approach in this vulnerable population.

Data Highlights

EndpointDescription
Primary EndpointSuccessful protocol management during the first 24 hours
Key Safety EndpointsAgitation, accidental extubation, respiratory depression, etc.
Secondary EndpointsAnalgesic exposure, ICU length of stay, in-hospital mortality

Key Findings

  • The study will enroll 65 adult patients post-neurosurgical craniotomy.
  • Patients will receive remifentanil-based analgesia with specific titration guidelines.
  • Rescue sedation with midazolam or propofol is permitted for safety.
  • Primary endpoint is defined as absence of protocol failure within 24 hours.
  • Significant agitation and neurological deterioration are key safety concerns.

Clinical Implications

Implementing an analgesia-first approach may enhance patient comfort and safety while allowing for necessary neurological assessments. Careful monitoring for agitation and other safety endpoints is essential to prevent complications in this population.

Conclusion

The study aims to provide insights into the safety and feasibility of minimizing hypnotic sedation in neurosurgical ICU patients, potentially guiding future pain management protocols.

Related Resources & Content

  1. Critical Care (Springer), 2026 -- Continuous ketamine infusion for surgical patients in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with GRADE assessment
  2. Intensive Care Medicine -- Patient-Centered Care and Comfort Through Minimal Sedation: The eCASH Approach
  3. Intensive Care Medicine -- A randomized controlled study on the effects of daily sedation breaks in critically ill pediatric patients
  4. A Focused Update to SCCM PADIS Guidelines for Adult Patients | SCCM
  5. Obesity Surgery — Impact of Anesthesia Depth on Postoperative Pain Management Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study
  6. Sedation and analgesia strategies in the neuro intensive care unit
  7. Efficacy and safety of midazolam versus dexmedetomidine in mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients
  8. A Focused Update to SCCM PADIS Guidelines for Adult Patients | SCCM

Original Source(s)

Related Content