Comment on “Long-term incontinence rates after traditional lateral internal sphincterotomy: a 5-year retrospective analysis from a high-volume tertiary referral center for proctologic disorders” - Report - MDSpire

Comment on “Long-term incontinence rates after traditional lateral internal sphincterotomy: a 5-year retrospective analysis from a high-volume tertiary referral center for proctologic disorders”

  • By

  • R. Liu

  • J. Li

  • R. Geng

  • H. Xu

  • S. Zhong

  • November 15, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Clinical Report: Five-Year Outcomes of Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy and Incontinence

Overview

This discussion highlights the long-term safety and continence outcomes following lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) for chronic anal fissure, emphasizing the importance of strict patient selection and standardized outcome measures. It underscores that while postoperative incontinence remains a concern, careful technique and follow-up demonstrate favorable long-term results.

Background

Lateral internal sphincterotomy is the gold standard surgical treatment for chronic anal fissure, aimed at relieving sphincter spasm and promoting healing. Despite its widespread use, concerns about postoperative fecal incontinence limit broader acceptance. Variability in reported incontinence rates may stem from inconsistent definitions and surgical expertise, while natural age-related anorectal decline complicates interpretation of postoperative symptoms.

Data Highlights

The study applied strict inclusion criteria excluding confounding factors such as vaginal delivery and pelvic surgery history to isolate the effect of LIS on continence. Postoperative incontinence was reported within the first year but lacked time-segmented stratification over the 5-year follow-up. Outcome measures included Wexner and Vaizey scores, capturing subjective continence and urgency, with an emphasis on patient satisfaction and quality of life.

Key Findings

  • LIS remains the gold standard for chronic anal fissure with validated efficacy in relieving sphincter spasm.
  • Strict patient selection minimizes confounding factors, enhancing the reliability of continence outcomes attributed to LIS.
  • Postoperative incontinence rates vary due to inconsistent definitions and surgeon technique differences.
  • Most fecal incontinence symptoms arise early postoperatively and often resolve spontaneously; long-term persistent dysfunction is rare.
  • Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life measures are critical for a comprehensive assessment of treatment impact.
  • Standardized definitions and time-specific reporting are needed for accurate risk estimation and patient counseling.

Clinical Implications

Clinicians should adhere to strict indications and meticulous surgical technique when performing LIS to optimize continence outcomes. Incorporating standardized definitions of incontinence and patient-reported outcome measures will improve postoperative assessment and guide shared decision-making. Awareness that early postoperative symptoms may be transient can help manage patient expectations.

Conclusion

This study supports the long-term safety of lateral internal sphincterotomy when performed carefully and highlights the need for standardized outcome reporting and patient-centered measures to refine risk assessment and enhance clinical decision-making.

References

  1. Realis Luc et al. 2023 -- Long-term incontinence rates after traditional lateral internal sphincterotomy
  2. Clinical guidelines -- Lateral internal sphincterotomy as gold standard for chronic anal fissure
  3. Epidemiologic studies on fecal incontinence prevalence and definitions
  4. Patient satisfaction and quality of life assessments in fecal incontinence

Original Source(s)

Related Content