Tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single center, single-arm phase 2 trial - Report - MDSpire
Advertisement
Tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine as first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: a single center, single-arm phase 2 trial
Clinical Report: Evaluation of Tislelizumab with Gemcitabine for Urothelial Carcinoma
Overview
This phase 2 study evaluates the efficacy and safety of tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who are unfit for cisplatin. The results indicate a median progression-free survival of 13.9 months and a median overall survival of 23.3 months, with an overall response rate of 46.7%.
Background
Locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) poses significant treatment challenges, particularly for patients ineligible for cisplatin due to renal impairment or other comorbidities. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the treatment landscape, but many patients still lack effective options. This study aims to address the unmet need for effective therapies in this patient population.
Data Highlights
Endpoint
Result
Median Progression-Free Survival (mPFS)
13.9 months (95% CI: 11.4–16.3)
Median Overall Survival (mOS)
23.3 months (IQR: 14.4–33.1; 95% CI: 18.2–28.3)
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
46.7% (14/30; 95% CI: 28.3–65.7)
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
76.7%
Leukopenia
43.3%
Neutropenia
40.0%
Key Findings
The combination of tislelizumab and gemcitabine showed a median progression-free survival of 13.9 months.
The median overall survival was reported at 23.3 months.
The confirmed overall response rate was 46.7% among the enrolled patients.
The disease control rate reached 76.7%.
Common treatment-related adverse events included hematological toxicities, particularly leukopenia and neutropenia.
There was a noted difference in response rates based on tumor-associated TLS status, though not statistically significant.
Clinical Implications
The findings suggest that tislelizumab combined with gemcitabine may be a viable first-line treatment option for patients with la/mUC who cannot tolerate cisplatin. Clinicians should consider this combination in treatment planning, particularly for patients with limited options due to comorbidities.
Conclusion
The study indicates that tislelizumab and gemcitabine may offer a promising therapeutic strategy for cisplatin-ineligible patients with la/mUC, warranting further investigation in larger trials.